E-mail List Archives
Re: ABBR vs. just spelling it out.
From: Kynn Bartlett
Date: Mar 22, 2006 11:30AM
- Next message: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- Previous message: John Foliot - WATS.ca: "RE: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- Next message in Thread: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- Previous message in Thread: John Foliot - WATS.ca: "RE: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- View all messages in this Thread
On 3/22/06, John Foliot - WATS.ca < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
>
> > I think that if the expansion is going to be claimed to be useful, it
> > makes more sense to require that the full version be used every time.
> > It makes as much sense as requiring <abbr> for every abbreviated
> > form.
>
> Yes... "you think...". However, your opinion is as baseless in hard
> data as mine, [...]
PS: You're deliberately misinterpreting the use of "think" here in order to
claim "baselessness in hard data." Can you please address the point raised
-- rather than trying to score rhetorical cheap shots?
Thanks!
- Next message: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- Previous message: John Foliot - WATS.ca: "RE: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- Next message in Thread: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- Previous message in Thread: John Foliot - WATS.ca: "RE: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- View all messages in this Thread