E-mail List Archives
RE: FW: Adding a label to search box
From: Hoffman, Allen
Date: Apr 19, 2006 12:40PM
- Next message: smithj7: "Perl, cgi, SSI - another baby question"
- Previous message: Jon Gunderson: "RE: Moz/FF extension"
- Next message in Thread: Penny Roberts: "Re: FW: Adding a label to search box"
- Previous message in Thread: smithj7: "RE: FW: Adding a label to search box - example that confusedreal users"
- View all messages in this Thread
To me this still sounds like the emperors new clothes to me.
A big word near an unlabeled edit box saying "search" doesn't say
"search for this".
it doesn't say "search what for this"
Sometimes being clear with language is worth a thousand visual layouts.
Even if only 0.1% of the audience has a usability problem with something
done as a "standard" visual way, isn't a reason to consider it really
purposefully accessible.
One of many complaints regarding the use of the web and electronic
communications in general is the great drop in the quality of writing.
This is often reflected not just in posts, but in actual web interfaces.
Try putting the box with search near it up for five year olds and see
how many times they have to try it to understand what the visual layout
represents.
convention doesn't mean clarity if not agreed to.
To be honest I'm not even remotely attached to my perspective but I tend
to question "the way it is" all the time. Any time the assumption that
its obvious is made I question if it really is obvious, and if so, to
whom, and to whom it isn't.
I'll leave it alone, but just wanted to raise the questions.
Allen Hoffman
- Next message: smithj7: "Perl, cgi, SSI - another baby question"
- Previous message: Jon Gunderson: "RE: Moz/FF extension"
- Next message in Thread: Penny Roberts: "Re: FW: Adding a label to search box"
- Previous message in Thread: smithj7: "RE: FW: Adding a label to search box - example that confusedreal users"
- View all messages in this Thread