E-mail List Archives
RE: Duplicate links...
From: Alastair Campbell
Date: Jun 9, 2006 2:50AM
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Duplicate links..."
- Previous message: vivek: "RE: set focus to button"
- Next message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Duplicate links..."
- Previous message in Thread: Moore, Michael: "RE: Duplicate links..."
- View all messages in this Thread
Moore, Michael wrote:
> If memory serves, Bobby (WebXM) Cynthia Says and Lift will
> all flag this
> situation as an error. This is why blind adherence to the results of
> automated testing tools is never advisable. It is much more important
> to understand the reasoning behind the guidelines and the implications
> of our coding decisions. I stand by my assertion that this
> situation is a judgment call. Different text can be helpful to some
users but
> does raise a minor concern in a screen reader link list.
Totally agreed.
If I were writing an automated rule set, I can understand reading it one
way (same link text should go to same resource), and assuming that it
should be the other way around to - it's not explicit.
But to be clear on what I think the criteria should be: would a person
understand where they are going?
In simple cases like "contact" vs "contact us", I wouldn't be concerned,
but as you said, it's a judgement call.
Kind regards,
-Alastair
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Duplicate links..."
- Previous message: vivek: "RE: set focus to button"
- Next message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Duplicate links..."
- Previous message in Thread: Moore, Michael: "RE: Duplicate links..."
- View all messages in this Thread