E-mail List Archives
Re: JAWS Screen Reader (and Word)
From: Joshue O Connor
Date: Oct 12, 2006 5:00AM
- Next message: Patrick Lauke: "Re: looking forhtml techniqueto provide a methodto skiprepetitive navigation linksi"
- Previous message: Patrick Lauke: "Re: looking for htmltechniqueto provide a methodto skiprepetitive navigation linksi"
- Next message in Thread: Jon Gunderson: "Re: JAWS Screen Reader (and Word)"
- Previous message in Thread: Eoin Campbell: "Re: JAWS Screen Reader (and Word)"
- View all messages in this Thread
> I believe the best way to assist
> visually-impaired readers of Word documents would be to use the
> same principles of applying structured markup (identifying headings,
> lists, tables, etc.) as is recommended for HTML.
Eoin is right. Also if structural documents are created in Word they can
then
be exported (problems with MS HTML not withstanding) as fairly
accessible HTML docs.
Josh
Eoin Campbell wrote:
> I'm not a JAWS expert, but I believe the best way to assist
> visually-impaired readers of Word documents would be to use the
> same principles of applying structured markup (identifying headings,
> lists, tables, etc.) as is recommended for HTML.
>
> Word has plenty of built-in styles such as Heading 1, Heading 2, List Bullet,
> which can be used to apply structure to a document.
> JAWS can use these structure styles to assist readers in navigating around
> the document.
> Using named styles consistently will also allow users apply their own
> preferred Word template (with larger fonts, for example), so that they can
> view it in a way that suits them.
>
>
> "DONALD WONNELL" < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
>> Is there any way to emphasize certain points on a Word document written
>> in textonly for the visually challenged audience? Don't want to have
>> unusually burdensome text for people to have to access.
>>
>> Heard underlining or bold text makes it harder for JAWS to read in some
>> versions, in others has no effect so there would be no advantage to
>> using it. At one time all caps was said to be easier for screen readers
>> to pick up. Please give me any info you may have on this.
>
>
********************************************************************
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments
is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of
the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify
the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to
delete it and any attachments from your system.
NCBI endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated
by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However,
it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of NCBI
********************************************************************
- Next message: Patrick Lauke: "Re: looking forhtml techniqueto provide a methodto skiprepetitive navigation linksi"
- Previous message: Patrick Lauke: "Re: looking for htmltechniqueto provide a methodto skiprepetitive navigation linksi"
- Next message in Thread: Jon Gunderson: "Re: JAWS Screen Reader (and Word)"
- Previous message in Thread: Eoin Campbell: "Re: JAWS Screen Reader (and Word)"
- View all messages in this Thread