E-mail List Archives
Re: Serif vs sans-serif
From: Philip Kiff
Date: Jan 3, 2007 1:40PM
- Next message: Austin, Darrel: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message: Sarah Horton: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Next message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message in Thread: Sarah Horton: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- View all messages in this Thread
Terry Thompson wrote on 3 January 2007 14:31EST:
> Is anyone aware of objective research that explores the question of
> which font style works best for users with visual impairments?
In addition to those mentioned by others, you might want to review:
A Comparison of Two Computer Fonts: Serif versus Ornate Sans Serif (2003)
By Sarah Morrison and Jan Noyes, University of Bristol, UK:
http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/52/UK_font.htm
Which Fonts Do Children Prefer to Read Online? (2001)
By Michael Bernard, Melissa Mills, Talissa Frank, & Jan McKown:
http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/3W/fontJR.htm
Reading and Typography (February 19th, 1999)
By Nathon John Hay
http://hubel.sfasu.edu/courseinfo/SL99/typography.html
APhont Product Presentation:
http://www.aph.org/products/presentations/aphont/index.html
Screenfont.ca:
http://screenfont.ca/
Phil.
- Next message: Austin, Darrel: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message: Sarah Horton: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Next message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message in Thread: Sarah Horton: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- View all messages in this Thread