E-mail List Archives
Re: screen resolutions, was Serif vs sans-serif
From: Alastair Campbell
Date: Jan 4, 2007 8:20AM
- Next message: Austin, Darrel: "Re: screen resolutions, was Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message: Emma Duke-Williams: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Next message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Re: screen resolutions, was Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
Emma Duke-Williams mentioned:
> a CRT monitor that was 800 by 600 pixels. (And I think a 15"
> screen).
And:
> a 1400 pixel screen - and a 12.1" screen.
That's a fairly major change in resolution (rover 25%?), without much of
a change in the interface sizes.
I think we are going to hear quite a lot about zoomable interfaces in
the next couple of years: Apple recently patented some "resolution
independent" interface methods.
I'm not sure if they will appear in the net version of OSX, but we can
already see the ideas filtering through to web design with IE7's zoom.
Of course, Opera has had this for years, but it's nice to see it getting
through to the desktop in general.
Kind regards,
-Alastair
--
Alastair Campbell | Director of User Experience
Nomensa Email Disclaimer:
http://www.nomensa.com/email-disclaimer.html
- Next message: Austin, Darrel: "Re: screen resolutions, was Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message: Emma Duke-Williams: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Next message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Re: screen resolutions, was Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread