E-mail List Archives
Number of posts in this thread: 3 (In chronological order)
From: ckrugman
Date: May 15, 2011 4:57PM
Subject: Re: evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)
No previous message | Next message →
I realize that this is a late response but as a screen reader user I very
seldom rely on the labels and attributes applied to links. There are other
issues involving accessibility that I find much more bothersome such as the
use of unlabeled images or flash content that was not properly labeled by
site developers.
Chuck
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Kirkpatrick" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)
I find myself wondering where to draw the line. If the argument for the use
of a list for any set of related links is based on the need for users to
know that a set of items are in a group and how many items are in that group
then perhaps lists should be used more - cnn.com has story after story on
their home page, do we recommend that the story titles and short teaser
blurbs be encased in a list item and the group of stories be marked up as a
list? This would help people know how many stories there are, why don't we
do this? Or even within a story, there may be nine paragraphs that are
related information that is supposed to be presented in an ordered fashion -
perhaps we need to put each paragraph into a list item and make the story an
ordered list? Of course, I'm being deliberately difficult but I think that
we may be overstating the importance of embedding simple sets of links into
semantic lists and running the risk of creating an unnecessarily verbose
audio UI for audio users.
Looking around, people that you'd think would be in tune with end-user needs
seem perfectly content without using OL or UL for sets of links...
Freedom Scientific's navigation bar:
<p class="navp"><a href="/default.asp"> Home </a> <img
src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/product-portal.asp" > Products
</a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt="" ><a href="/purchase.asp"> Purchase
</a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/support.asp"> Support
</a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/training.asp"> Training
</a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/about/about.asp"> About Us
</a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/about/vision-facts.asp">
Low Vision Facts </a></p>
GW-Micro's navbar:
<A HREF="#mainHeadingTitle" STYLE="position: absolute; left: -1000px;
font-size: 0px;">Skip to Main Content</A><A CLASS="navBarLink"
HREF="/Window-Eyes" onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Window-Eyes</A> <IMG
SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Notetakers"
onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Notetakers</A> <IMG
SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/DAISY_Readers"
onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >DAISY Readers</A> <IMG
SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Braille_Displays"
onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Braille Displays</A> <IMG
SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Low_Vision"
onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Low Vision</A> <IMG
SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Support" onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Support</A> <IMG
SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Training"
onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Training</A>
National Federation of the Blind navbar:
<div id="HomeMenu"><a
href="http://www.nfb.org/nfb/About_the_NFB.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_About.gif" alt="About NFB" width="128"
height="38" border="0"></a><img
src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
alt="Line"><a
href="http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Info_About_Vision_Loss_For.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Information.gif" alt="Information About
Vision Loss For" width="169" height="38" border="0"></a><img
src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
alt="Line"><a href="http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Members.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Members.gif" alt="Members" width="103"
height="38" border="0"></a><img
src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
alt="Line"><a
href="http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Resources.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Resources.gif" alt="Resources" width="117"
height="38" border="0"></a><img
src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
alt="Line"><a
href="http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Products_and_Technology.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Products.gif" alt="Products and
Technology" width="114" height="38" border="0"></a><img
src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
alt="Line"><a
href="http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Publications.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Publications.gif" alt="Publications"
width="127" height="38" border="0"></a></div>
American Council of the Blind nav:
<p><font size="-2">
[<A HREF="index.html">ACB Home</A> |
<A HREF="profile.html">About ACB</A> |
<A HREF="washington/index.html">Washington Connection</A> |
<A HREF="magazine/index.html">Braille Forum</A> |
<A
HREF="http://acb.org/store/index.php?option=com_content&;view=article&id=11&Itemid=14">Donate
to ACB</A> |
<br>
<A HREF="affiliates/index.html">Affiliates</A> |
<A HREF="resources/index.html">Helpful Resources</A> |
<a href="conference/index.html">Conference and Convention</a> |
<a href="http://acb.org/store/index.html">ACB Store</a> ]
</font></p>
Worth noting that AFB and RNIB both use lists widely.
On Zeldman.com, there are items that seem like lists, but are not marked up
as such:
e.g. "Filed under: A Book Apart, A List Apart, content, content strategy,
Design, E-Books, editorial, Education, wordpress"
Same thing on the Yahoo! Accessibility blog:
"Tags: assistive technology, Closed Captions, Deaf, hard of hearing, sean
zdenek, Television"
My gut is that we are calling things lists when the design aspects of web
development work make it easy to do so, and that the connection to what
users need is not clearly identified. I'd really like to see a description
of what content types belong in lists and to what level of complexity an
author should pursue in achieving that goal. Until we have that, when I see
a set of links that are marked up inline within a simple paragraph I can't
justify calling it a 1.3.1 failure.
Thanks,
AWK
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
From: ckrugman
Date: May 16, 2011 12:42AM
Subject: Re: evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)
← Previous message | Next message →
As a screen reader I don't like the idea of extra keyboard commands as it
slows down the process. We could always go back to the standard rule in
English grammar regarding uses of commas in that anything less than three
items does not require the use of a comma. Perhaps this could be carried
over to lists.
Chuck
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Kiss" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)
Being deliberately difficult can sometimes be useful :)
Despite my seeming protestations, I do echo your concerns, Andrew. It is
very easy to see lists everywhere, and I am sensitive to the fact that not
everything that is list-like should be marked up as a list, if only to avoid
unnecessary noise. I, too, would like a more definite account of what
content calls for list markup. Where my apparently demanding predilection
for marking up a set of links in a nav bar as a list comes from, I don't
know. I do think that list markup is semantically appropriate in this case,
but it could also be that I'm just a slave to that convention. Then again,
for some reason I'm okay with short lists of items that appear as part of a
sentence or a more sentence-like structure, as I would consider the
Zeldman.com and Yahoo! Accessibility Blog cases. I do the same thing on my
site.
Seeing how common the non-list markup approach is on sites like Freedom
Scientific's, GW Micro's, the NFB's and the ACB's, perhaps it's just not
something anyone should really get concerned about, at least from a screen
reader accessibility and WCAG perspective.
Then again, it's interesting to note that the HTML on those four sites is
quite poor to begin with, at least compared to the AFB and RNIB sites, which
have relatively decent markup and do use the list markup for their nav
links. Presumably these last two sites have the same concerns in terms of
accessibility and usability for screen reader users.
Also, while list markup does lead to additional UI audio for screen reader
users, isn't the point of HTML the structural and semantic markup of the
content? What assistive technologies do with this programmatic information
is to some degree up to them. Not applying more semantic markup for the sake
of one group of assistive technologies doesn't seem the ideal path to me.
But then these are the sorts of accommodations that we end up making all the
time, and especially for screen readers. Maybe the default verbosity of
screen readers around lists is just too great. What if lists were just
verbally introduced and closed with the words "List" and "List end", leaving
additional keyboard commands for users to interrogate the number of list
items, navigate by list item, etc., if they wished?
So, no easy answers here on the list markup question, it seems, but this is
where my other concern kicks in, and that is the place for interpretation in
WCAG and Success Criteria like 1.3.1. Is there a certain and definitive
answer in this case, or are interpretations, opinions and arguments all that
we have? Again, I'm not suggesting this is a bad thing.
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Kiss
Web: www.accessibleculture.org
Email: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Twitter: @jkiss
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick
< = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >wrote:
> I find myself wondering where to draw the line. If the argument for the
> use of a list for any set of related links is based on the need for users
> to
> know that a set of items are in a group and how many items are in that
> group
> then perhaps lists should be used more - cnn.com has story after story on
> their home page, do we recommend that the story titles and short teaser
> blurbs be encased in a list item and the group of stories be marked up as
> a
> list? This would help people know how many stories there are, why don't we
> do this? Or even within a story, there may be nine paragraphs that are
> related information that is supposed to be presented in an ordered
> fashion -
> perhaps we need to put each paragraph into a list item and make the story
> an
> ordered list? Of course, I'm being deliberately difficult but I think
> that
> we may be overstating the importance of embedding simple sets of links
> into
> semantic lists and running the risk of creating an unnecessarily verbose
> audio UI for audio users.
>
> Looking around, people that you'd think would be in tune with end-user
> needs seem perfectly content without using OL or UL for sets of links...
>
> Freedom Scientific's navigation bar:
> <p class="navp"><a href="/default.asp"> Home </a> <img
> src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/product-portal.asp" > Products
> </a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt="" ><a href="/purchase.asp"> Purchase
> </a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/support.asp"> Support
> </a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/training.asp"> Training
> </a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/about/about.asp"> About
> Us </a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a
> href="/about/vision-facts.asp"> Low Vision Facts </a></p>
>
> GW-Micro's navbar:
> <A HREF="#mainHeadingTitle" STYLE="position: absolute; left: -1000px;
> font-size: 0px;">Skip to Main Content</A><A CLASS="navBarLink"
> HREF="/Window-Eyes" onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Window-Eyes</A> <IMG
> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Notetakers"
> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Notetakers</A> <IMG
> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/DAISY_Readers"
> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >DAISY Readers</A> <IMG
> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Braille_Displays"
> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Braille Displays</A> <IMG
> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Low_Vision"
> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Low Vision</A> <IMG
> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Support"
> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Support</A> <IMG
> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Training"
> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Training</A>
>
> National Federation of the Blind navbar:
> <div id="HomeMenu"><a href="
> http://www.nfb.org/nfb/About_the_NFB.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_About.gif" alt="About NFB" width="128"
> height="38" border="0"></a><img
> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
> alt="Line"><a href="
> http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Info_About_Vision_Loss_For.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Information.gif" alt="Information About
> Vision Loss For" width="169" height="38" border="0"></a><img
> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
> alt="Line"><a
> href="http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Members.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Members.gif" alt="Members" width="103"
> height="38" border="0"></a><img
> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
> alt="Line"><a
> href="http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Resources.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Resources.gif" alt="Resources"
> width="117"
> height="38" border="0"></a><img
> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
> alt="Line"><a href="
> http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Products_and_Technology.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Products.gif" alt="Products and
> Technology" width="114" height="38" border="0"></a><img
> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
> alt="Line"><a href="
> http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Publications.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Publications.gif" alt="Publications"
> width="127" height="38" border="0"></a></div>
>
> American Council of the Blind nav:
> <p><font size="-2">
> [<A HREF="index.html">ACB Home</A> |
>
> <A HREF="profile.html">About ACB</A> |
> <A HREF="washington/index.html">Washington Connection</A> |
> <A HREF="magazine/index.html">Braille Forum</A> |
> <A HREF="
> http://acb.org/store/index.php?option=com_content&;view=article&id=11&Itemid=14">Donate
> to ACB</A> |
> <br>
> <A HREF="affiliates/index.html">Affiliates</A> |
> <A HREF="resources/index.html">Helpful Resources</A> |
>
> <a href="conference/index.html">Conference and Convention</a> |
> <a href="http://acb.org/store/index.html">ACB Store</a> ]
> </font></p>
>
> Worth noting that AFB and RNIB both use lists widely.
>
> On Zeldman.com, there are items that seem like lists, but are not marked
> up
> as such:
> e.g. "Filed under: A Book Apart, A List Apart, content, content strategy,
> Design, E-Books, editorial, Education, wordpress"
>
> Same thing on the Yahoo! Accessibility blog:
> "Tags: assistive technology, Closed Captions, Deaf, hard of hearing, sean
> zdenek, Television"
>
> My gut is that we are calling things lists when the design aspects of web
> development work make it easy to do so, and that the connection to what
> users need is not clearly identified. I'd really like to see a
> description
> of what content types belong in lists and to what level of complexity an
> author should pursue in achieving that goal. Until we have that, when I
> see
> a set of links that are marked up inline within a simple paragraph I can't
> justify calling it a 1.3.1 failure.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe Systems
>
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
>
>
>
From: E.J. Zufelt
Date: May 16, 2011 12:51AM
Subject: Re: evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)
← Previous message | No next message
Good afternoon,
IMO * Everything * that is a list should be marked up as a list, be there 1, 2, 3, or more items, this is proper semantics. However, assistive technology vendors are completely free to present shorter lists without the added textual representation of the list semantics.
HTH,
Everett Zufelt
http://zufelt.ca
Follow me on Twitter
http://twitter.com/ezufelt
View my LinkedIn Profile
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ezufelt
On 2011-05-16, at 2:42 AM, < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
> As a screen reader I don't like the idea of extra keyboard commands as it
> slows down the process. We could always go back to the standard rule in
> English grammar regarding uses of commas in that anything less than three
> items does not require the use of a comma. Perhaps this could be carried
> over to lists.
> Chuck
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Kiss" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 4:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] evaluating accessibility with WCAG 2.0 (Angela French)
>
>
> Being deliberately difficult can sometimes be useful :)
>
> Despite my seeming protestations, I do echo your concerns, Andrew. It is
> very easy to see lists everywhere, and I am sensitive to the fact that not
> everything that is list-like should be marked up as a list, if only to avoid
> unnecessary noise. I, too, would like a more definite account of what
> content calls for list markup. Where my apparently demanding predilection
> for marking up a set of links in a nav bar as a list comes from, I don't
> know. I do think that list markup is semantically appropriate in this case,
> but it could also be that I'm just a slave to that convention. Then again,
> for some reason I'm okay with short lists of items that appear as part of a
> sentence or a more sentence-like structure, as I would consider the
> Zeldman.com and Yahoo! Accessibility Blog cases. I do the same thing on my
> site.
>
> Seeing how common the non-list markup approach is on sites like Freedom
> Scientific's, GW Micro's, the NFB's and the ACB's, perhaps it's just not
> something anyone should really get concerned about, at least from a screen
> reader accessibility and WCAG perspective.
>
> Then again, it's interesting to note that the HTML on those four sites is
> quite poor to begin with, at least compared to the AFB and RNIB sites, which
> have relatively decent markup and do use the list markup for their nav
> links. Presumably these last two sites have the same concerns in terms of
> accessibility and usability for screen reader users.
>
> Also, while list markup does lead to additional UI audio for screen reader
> users, isn't the point of HTML the structural and semantic markup of the
> content? What assistive technologies do with this programmatic information
> is to some degree up to them. Not applying more semantic markup for the sake
> of one group of assistive technologies doesn't seem the ideal path to me.
> But then these are the sorts of accommodations that we end up making all the
> time, and especially for screen readers. Maybe the default verbosity of
> screen readers around lists is just too great. What if lists were just
> verbally introduced and closed with the words "List" and "List end", leaving
> additional keyboard commands for users to interrogate the number of list
> items, navigate by list item, etc., if they wished?
>
> So, no easy answers here on the list markup question, it seems, but this is
> where my other concern kicks in, and that is the place for interpretation in
> WCAG and Success Criteria like 1.3.1. Is there a certain and definitive
> answer in this case, or are interpretations, opinions and arguments all that
> we have? Again, I'm not suggesting this is a bad thing.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> --
> Jason Kiss
> Web: www.accessibleculture.org
> Email: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> Twitter: @jkiss
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick
> < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >wrote:
>
>> I find myself wondering where to draw the line. If the argument for the
>> use of a list for any set of related links is based on the need for users
>> to
>> know that a set of items are in a group and how many items are in that
>> group
>> then perhaps lists should be used more - cnn.com has story after story on
>> their home page, do we recommend that the story titles and short teaser
>> blurbs be encased in a list item and the group of stories be marked up as
>> a
>> list? This would help people know how many stories there are, why don't we
>> do this? Or even within a story, there may be nine paragraphs that are
>> related information that is supposed to be presented in an ordered
>> fashion -
>> perhaps we need to put each paragraph into a list item and make the story
>> an
>> ordered list? Of course, I'm being deliberately difficult but I think
>> that
>> we may be overstating the importance of embedding simple sets of links
>> into
>> semantic lists and running the risk of creating an unnecessarily verbose
>> audio UI for audio users.
>>
>> Looking around, people that you'd think would be in tune with end-user
>> needs seem perfectly content without using OL or UL for sets of links...
>>
>> Freedom Scientific's navigation bar:
>> <p class="navp"><a href="/default.asp"> Home </a> <img
>> src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/product-portal.asp" > Products
>> </a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt="" ><a href="/purchase.asp"> Purchase
>> </a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/support.asp"> Support
>> </a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/training.asp"> Training
>> </a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a href="/about/about.asp"> About
>> Us </a><img src="/images/vline.gif" alt=""><a
>> href="/about/vision-facts.asp"> Low Vision Facts </a></p>
>>
>> GW-Micro's navbar:
>> <A HREF="#mainHeadingTitle" STYLE="position: absolute; left: -1000px;
>> font-size: 0px;">Skip to Main Content</A><A CLASS="navBarLink"
>> HREF="/Window-Eyes" onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
>> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Window-Eyes</A> <IMG
>> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
>> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Notetakers"
>> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
>> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Notetakers</A> <IMG
>> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
>> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/DAISY_Readers"
>> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
>> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >DAISY Readers</A> <IMG
>> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
>> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Braille_Displays"
>> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
>> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Braille Displays</A> <IMG
>> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
>> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Low_Vision"
>> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
>> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Low Vision</A> <IMG
>> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
>> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Support"
>> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
>> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Support</A> <IMG
>> SRC="/images/white_bullet.gif" ALT="" ALIGN="bottom"> <A
>> CLASS="navBarLink" HREF="/Training"
>> onMouseOver="this.style.color='#230E75';"
>> onMouseOut="this.style.color='#FFFFFF';" >Training</A>
>>
>> National Federation of the Blind navbar:
>> <div id="HomeMenu"><a href="
>> http://www.nfb.org/nfb/About_the_NFB.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
>> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_About.gif" alt="About NFB" width="128"
>> height="38" border="0"></a><img
>> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
>> alt="Line"><a href="
>> http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Info_About_Vision_Loss_For.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
>> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Information.gif" alt="Information About
>> Vision Loss For" width="169" height="38" border="0"></a><img
>> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
>> alt="Line"><a
>> href="http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Members.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
>> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Members.gif" alt="Members" width="103"
>> height="38" border="0"></a><img
>> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
>> alt="Line"><a
>> href="http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Resources.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
>> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Resources.gif" alt="Resources"
>> width="117"
>> height="38" border="0"></a><img
>> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
>> alt="Line"><a href="
>> http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Products_and_Technology.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
>> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Products.gif" alt="Products and
>> Technology" width="114" height="38" border="0"></a><img
>> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_MeniDivider.gif" width="1" height="38"
>> alt="Line"><a href="
>> http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Publications.asp?SnID=1950147763"><img
>> src="/images/nfb/Template/NFBHome_Publications.gif" alt="Publications"
>> width="127" height="38" border="0"></a></div>
>>
>> American Council of the Blind nav:
>> <p><font size="-2">
>> [<A HREF="index.html">ACB Home</A> |
>>
>> <A HREF="profile.html">About ACB</A> |
>> <A HREF="washington/index.html">Washington Connection</A> |
>> <A HREF="magazine/index.html">Braille Forum</A> |
>> <A HREF="
>> http://acb.org/store/index.php?option=com_content&;view=article&id=11&Itemid=14">Donate
>> to ACB</A> |
>> <br>
>> <A HREF="affiliates/index.html">Affiliates</A> |
>> <A HREF="resources/index.html">Helpful Resources</A> |
>>
>> <a href="conference/index.html">Conference and Convention</a> |
>> <a href="http://acb.org/store/index.html">ACB Store</a> ]
>> </font></p>
>>
>> Worth noting that AFB and RNIB both use lists widely.
>>
>> On Zeldman.com, there are items that seem like lists, but are not marked
>> up
>> as such:
>> e.g. "Filed under: A Book Apart, A List Apart, content, content strategy,
>> Design, E-Books, editorial, Education, wordpress"
>>
>> Same thing on the Yahoo! Accessibility blog:
>> "Tags: assistive technology, Closed Captions, Deaf, hard of hearing, sean
>> zdenek, Television"
>>
>> My gut is that we are calling things lists when the design aspects of web
>> development work make it easy to do so, and that the connection to what
>> users need is not clearly identified. I'd really like to see a
>> description
>> of what content types belong in lists and to what level of complexity an
>> author should pursue in achieving that goal. Until we have that, when I
>> see
>> a set of links that are marked up inline within a simple paragraph I can't
>> justify calling it a 1.3.1 failure.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> AWK
>>
>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>> Adobe Systems
>>
>> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
>>
>>
>>