WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: HTML validator (preferably accessible), what do you use (one that accepts ARIA)

for

Number of posts in this thread: 7 (In chronological order)

From: Birkir R. Gunnarsson
Date: Thu, May 23 2013 11:04AM
Subject: HTML validator (preferably accessible), what do you use (one that accepts ARIA)
No previous message | Next message →

Hey gang

I am looking for the best way to test WCAG SC 4.1 .. basically
validating HTML code.
What would be a recommended html validator that understands and
accepts ARIA mark up, and is accessible?
Cheers
-Birkir

From: Kohn, Robbie
Date: Thu, May 23 2013 1:08PM
Subject: Re: HTML validator (preferably accessible), what do you use (one that accepts ARIA)
← Previous message | Next message →

Prior to having Policy Tester installed, we used Total Validator, available here:

http://www.totalvalidator.com/




Robbie Ann Kohn
E: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =

From: Steve Faulkner
Date: Thu, May 23 2013 2:06PM
Subject: Re: HTML validator (preferably accessible), what do you use (one that accepts ARIA)
← Previous message | Next message →

this may be of help:
http://blog.paciellogroup.com/2012/02/wcag-2-0-parsing-error-bookmarklet/
--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1


On 23 May 2013 18:04, Birkir R. Gunnarsson < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
> Hey gang
>
> I am looking for the best way to test WCAG SC 4.1 .. basically
> validating HTML code.
> What would be a recommended html validator that understands and
> accepts ARIA mark up, and is accessible?
> Cheers
> -Birkir
> > >

From: Scott González
Date: Thu, May 23 2013 2:15PM
Subject: Re: HTML validator (preferably accessible), what do you use (one that accepts ARIA)
← Previous message | Next message →

Have you tried http://validator.nu/? It's open source, hosted on
Bitbucket<https://bitbucket.org/validator/validator/overview>,
and actively maintained by developers involved in W3C/WHATWG. You can also
use vnu <https://bitbucket.org/sideshowbarker/vnu/overview>, if you want to
run the validation locally. We built a Grunt
plugin<https://github.com/jzaefferer/grunt-html>on top of vnu to
validate files for jQuery UI.


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Birkir R. Gunnarsson <
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:

> Hey gang
>
> I am looking for the best way to test WCAG SC 4.1 .. basically
> validating HTML code.
> What would be a recommended html validator that understands and
> accepts ARIA mark up, and is accessible?
> Cheers
> -Birkir
> > > >

From: Robert Jaquiss
Date: Thu, May 23 2013 4:26PM
Subject: Re: HTML validator (preferably accessible), what do you use (one that accepts ARIA)
← Previous message | Next message →

Hello:

I confess that I haven't read all the posts on this topic, so
hopefully, I am not repeating aprevious post. I have used:
http://validator.w3.org/
There is also a validator for CSS. These tools take a bit of practice. Hope
this helps.

Regards,

Robert

From: Steve Faulkner
Date: Fri, May 24 2013 6:24AM
Subject: Re: HTML validator (preferably accessible), what do you use (one that accepts ARIA)
← Previous message | Next message →

Note: http://validator.nu/ has some different validation rules to the
W3C validation service as it checks for conformance with the WHATWG
LS, not the W3C HTML spec
--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1


On 23 May 2013 21:15, Scott González < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
> Have you tried http://validator.nu/? It's open source, hosted on
> Bitbucket<https://bitbucket.org/validator/validator/overview>,
> and actively maintained by developers involved in W3C/WHATWG. You can also
> use vnu <https://bitbucket.org/sideshowbarker/vnu/overview>, if you want to
> run the validation locally. We built a Grunt
> plugin<https://github.com/jzaefferer/grunt-html>on top of vnu to
> validate files for jQuery UI.
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Birkir R. Gunnarsson <
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
>
>> Hey gang
>>
>> I am looking for the best way to test WCAG SC 4.1 .. basically
>> validating HTML code.
>> What would be a recommended html validator that understands and
>> accepts ARIA mark up, and is accessible?
>> Cheers
>> -Birkir
>> >> >> >>
> > >

From: Steve Faulkner
Date: Sat, May 25 2013 7:32AM
Subject: Re: HTML validator (preferably accessible), what do you use (one that accepts ARIA)
← Previous message | No next message

FYI

if you are building a local version of validator.nu for w3c mode, you
need to invoke it like this: " ./build/build.py --w3cbranding build
run
--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1


On 24 May 2013 13:24, Steve Faulkner < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
> Note: http://validator.nu/ has some different validation rules to the
> W3C validation service as it checks for conformance with the WHATWG
> LS, not the W3C HTML spec
> --
>
> Regards
>
> SteveF
> HTML 5.1
>
>
> On 23 May 2013 21:15, Scott González < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
>> Have you tried http://validator.nu/? It's open source, hosted on
>> Bitbucket<https://bitbucket.org/validator/validator/overview>,
>> and actively maintained by developers involved in W3C/WHATWG. You can also
>> use vnu <https://bitbucket.org/sideshowbarker/vnu/overview>, if you want to
>> run the validation locally. We built a Grunt
>> plugin<https://github.com/jzaefferer/grunt-html>on top of vnu to
>> validate files for jQuery UI.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Birkir R. Gunnarsson <
>> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
>>
>>> Hey gang
>>>
>>> I am looking for the best way to test WCAG SC 4.1 .. basically
>>> validating HTML code.
>>> What would be a recommended html validator that understands and
>>> accepts ARIA mark up, and is accessible?
>>> Cheers
>>> -Birkir
>>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >> >>