E-mail List Archives
Thread: FAE Accessibility evaluate her
Number of posts in this thread: 5 (In chronological order)
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Fri, Nov 16 2018 8:01AM
Subject: FAE Accessibility evaluate her
No previous message | Next message →
On 16/11/2018 14:57, Reinhard Stebner wrote:
> What do you think of the FAE Web evaluator and how does this compare to Wave? How does this compare with WAVE
Last time I looked at it (admittedly a few years back), I found it very
"opinionated". Flagging things as failures that were really just best
practices/suggestions, in my view (like, from memory, flagging absence
of a heading before a navigation section, to indicate it's a navigation
section, as a failure)
It may have improved in the last few years though...
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
From: Laura Fathauer
Date: Fri, Nov 16 2018 8:08AM
Subject: Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her
← Previous message | Next message →
It has the most extensive, strict ruleset. But I like thata its in the
browser window and dynamically updates as you browse.
Laura
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:01 AM Patrick H. Lauke < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
wrote:
> On 16/11/2018 14:57, Reinhard Stebner wrote:
> > What do you think of the FAE Web evaluator and how does this compare to
> Wave? How does this compare with WAVE
>
> Last time I looked at it (admittedly a few years back), I found it very
> "opinionated". Flagging things as failures that were really just best
> practices/suggestions, in my view (like, from memory, flagging absence
> of a heading before a navigation section, to indicate it's a navigation
> section, as a failure)
>
> It may have improved in the last few years though...
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
> > > > >
From: Greg Jellin
Date: Fri, Nov 16 2018 8:20AM
Subject: Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her
← Previous message | Next message →
FAE is awesome. It isn't perfect, but very detailed and finds things
that other tools don't. It is great to use in addition to other tools.
Greg
On 11/16/2018 7:08 AM, Laura Fathauer wrote:
> It has the most extensive, strict ruleset. But I like thata its in the
> browser window and dynamically updates as you browse.
>
> Laura
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:01 AM Patrick H. Lauke < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> wrote:
>
>> On 16/11/2018 14:57, Reinhard Stebner wrote:
>>> What do you think of the FAE Web evaluator and how does this compare to
>> Wave? How does this compare with WAVE
>>
>> Last time I looked at it (admittedly a few years back), I found it very
>> "opinionated". Flagging things as failures that were really just best
>> practices/suggestions, in my view (like, from memory, flagging absence
>> of a heading before a navigation section, to indicate it's a navigation
>> section, as a failure)
>>
>> It may have improved in the last few years though...
>>
>> P
>> --
>> Patrick H. Lauke
>>
>> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
>> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
>> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>> >> >> >> >>
> > > >
From: England, Kristina
Date: Fri, Nov 16 2018 8:26AM
Subject: Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her
← Previous message | Next message →
I like how detailed it is. Honestly, it's the only one I feel causes folks here to stop and ask questions they might not have with the other tools because of its results.
Kristina England
On 11/16/18, 10:22 AM, "WebAIM-Forum on behalf of Greg Jellin" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = on behalf of = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
FAE is awesome. It isn't perfect, but very detailed and finds things
that other tools don't. It is great to use in addition to other tools.
Greg
On 11/16/2018 7:08 AM, Laura Fathauer wrote:
> It has the most extensive, strict ruleset. But I like thata its in the
> browser window and dynamically updates as you browse.
>
> Laura
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:01 AM Patrick H. Lauke < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> wrote:
>
>> On 16/11/2018 14:57, Reinhard Stebner wrote:
>>> What do you think of the FAE Web evaluator and how does this compare to
>> Wave? How does this compare with WAVE
>>
>> Last time I looked at it (admittedly a few years back), I found it very
>> "opinionated". Flagging things as failures that were really just best
>> practices/suggestions, in my view (like, from memory, flagging absence
>> of a heading before a navigation section, to indicate it's a navigation
>> section, as a failure)
>>
>> It may have improved in the last few years though...
>>
>> P
>> --
>> Patrick H. Lauke
>>
>> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
>> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
>> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>> >> >> >> >>
> > > >
From: Luis Garcia
Date: Fri, Nov 16 2018 4:33PM
Subject: Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her
← Previous message | No next message
It is definitely opinionated, but I tend to agree with those opinions.
And while I agree with Patrick that it calls things that should be best
practices as failures, it also provides a lot of information to help
educate the user. I also like the way it finds things that require manual
checks and instructs you how to do the manual check!
And in case folks hadn't noticed, there's a new version of the "AInspector
Sidebar" (the browser extension version of FAE) that works with Firefox
Quantum. It's now called "AInspector WCAG."
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ainspector-wcag/
luis
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:26 AM England, Kristina < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
wrote:
> I like how detailed it is. Honestly, it's the only one I feel causes
> folks here to stop and ask questions they might not have with the other
> tools because of its results.
>
> Kristina England
>
>
>
>
> On 11/16/18, 10:22 AM, "WebAIM-Forum on behalf of Greg Jellin" <
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = on behalf of = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> wrote:
>
> FAE is awesome. It isn't perfect, but very detailed and finds things
> that other tools don't. It is great to use in addition to other tools.
>
> Greg
>
> On 11/16/2018 7:08 AM, Laura Fathauer wrote:
> > It has the most extensive, strict ruleset. But I like thata its in
> the
> > browser window and dynamically updates as you browse.
> >
> > Laura
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:01 AM Patrick H. Lauke <
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 16/11/2018 14:57, Reinhard Stebner wrote:
> >>> What do you think of the FAE Web evaluator and how does this
> compare to
> >> Wave? How does this compare with WAVE
> >>
> >> Last time I looked at it (admittedly a few years back), I found it
> very
> >> "opinionated". Flagging things as failures that were really just
> best
> >> practices/suggestions, in my view (like, from memory, flagging
> absence
> >> of a heading before a navigation section, to indicate it's a
> navigation
> >> section, as a failure)
> >>
> >> It may have improved in the last few years though...
> >>
> >> P
> >> --
> >> Patrick H. Lauke
> >>
> >> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> >> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> >> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
> >> > >> > >> > >> > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > > >
--
Luis Garcia
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =