WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: Re: Bobby Approved

for

Number of posts in this thread: 1 (In chronological order)

From: JAMESICUS@aol.com
Date: Tue, Aug 05 2003 10:50AM
Subject: Re: Bobby Approved
No previous message | No next message

John E. Brandt wrote:

<<<<<
There are a number of other validators out there. All have pluses and
minuses; none are perfect. There have been discussions on this list before
about the merits of "certifying" that a site is "compliant," "meets
standards," "accessible," etc. If you are looking to simply meet the
requirements of the Bobby site, that's fine, but it will leave you short in
terms of complete accessibility and usability. I'm sure others may want to
chime in here.
>>>>>

John wrote:

<<<<<
I am also aware of this problem with Bobby, so I would recommend you to try
another validator company as UsableNet or other, who provide unlimited free
evaluations and logos for your page.

I pe