WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: RE: <em> v. <i> and <strong> v. <b>

for

Number of posts in this thread: 1 (In chronological order)

From: Karl Groves
Date: Fri, Sep 05 2003 9:53AM
Subject: RE: <em> v. <i> and <strong> v. <b>
No previous message | No next message

> Although this kind of pragmatism isn't typical of standards
> people, the
> reason those two tags haven't been formally deprecated might
> just be the
> practical fact that such deprecation would instantly render
> millions of
> otherwise largely inoffensive web pages invalid.

I'd venture to guess that these same sites have scores of other reasons they'd be invalid.
;-)

Karl L. Groves, Certified Master CIW Designer
E-Commerce Manager
NASA Federal Credit Union
500 Prince Georges Blvd.
Upper Marlboro, MD 20774

301-249-1800 ext.497
Fax: 301-390-4531

Opinions expressed in this e-mail represent only myself and are not in any way to be taken as the words or opinions of my employer.


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, suspend, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/