E-mail List Archives
Thread: Text Versions
Number of posts in this thread: 4 (In chronological order)
From: RC
Date: Wed, Aug 11 2004 12:14PM
Subject: Text Versions
No previous message | Next message →
Okay,
We also are implementing a text version.
Does anyone have a type available for view that is compliant?
Also,
Is it better to have an A-Z index instead?
Thanks again all!
RC
From: Earl Machen
Date: Thu, Aug 12 2004 6:43AM
Subject: Re: Text Versions
← Previous message | Next message →
This one is bobby aaa and w3c compliant http://uwsag.com/textonly/
From: RC
Date: Fri, Aug 20 2004 12:18PM
Subject: Text Versions
← Previous message | Next message →
Thank you again for all the info on the text versions. I feel the same
way..
Anywho what about..
An A-Z indexed text version used as the format for the "Text version."
I want to accomplish 2 things. 1. get rid of the site map we use use an a-z
index and 2. use it as the Text version.
Thank you,
RC
From: Jukka K. Korpela
Date: Fri, Aug 20 2004 1:38PM
Subject: Re: Text Versions
← Previous message | No next message
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, rcarrill wrote:
> Thank you again for all the info on the text versions. I feel the same
> way..
Sorry... what info, what way? It's easy to lose context in E-mail
discussions.
> Anywho what about..
>
> An A-Z indexed text version used as the format for the "Text version."
Pardon? A-Z indexed text version for what, and why?
> I want to accomplish 2 things. 1. get rid of the site map we use use an a-z
> index and 2. use it as the Text version.
Sorry, I cannot see what you mean. An alphabetic list of all pages is most
probably very useful. (Calling it "site map" is not that useful, but
common parlance I guess.) Why get rid of it?
Why would you create a text version? Text versions almost always work
against accessibility.
(I recently realized yet another reason to say "no" to text versions:
authors - designers, content providers - rarely use text versions
themselves. They might test them, somehow, at an early stage. But they
stop using them, sticking to the normal version. They won't see the
problems that emerge later, and they don't _experience_ the pages as text
versions.)
--
Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/