E-mail List Archives

Search E-mail List Archives for

Number of posts in this thread: 3 (In chronological order)

From: Julius Serrano
Date: Tue, Oct 06 2020 3:15PM
Subject: recommendations re WCAG 2.2
No previous message | Next message →

Hi all.

Please can I ask what your recommendations are regarding WCAG 2.2? How
active should each discipline be (front end, QA, visual design, BA) in
terms of including it in their processes? Should we focus on 2.1 instead
and wait for any official announcement?


Thanks


Julius

From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Tue, Oct 06 2020 3:29PM
Subject: Re: recommendations re WCAG 2.2
← Previous message | Next message →

On 06/10/2020 22:15, Julius Serrano wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Please can I ask what your recommendations are regarding WCAG 2.2? How
> active should each discipline be (front end, QA, visual design, BA) in
> terms of including it in their processes? Should we focus on 2.1 instead
> and wait for any official announcement?

2.2. isn't even finalised, and the proposed new SCs may well change or
even be dropped completely. And 2.2 builds on 2.1, so it's only really
introducing additional SCs, but the rest is the same (with the exception
of changes of levels for some old 2.1 SCs).

Long story short: focus on 2.1. And when 2.2 is actually
finalised/released, look at the new SCs that it introduces/subtle
changes to any 2.1 SCs it brings.

P
--
Patrick H. Lauke

https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

From: Julius Serrano
Date: Wed, Oct 07 2020 3:30PM
Subject: Re: recommendations re WCAG 2.2
← Previous message | No next message

Thanks, Patrick.

This is helpful to know - focus on 2.1 an look at 2.2 when it is
finalised / released.


> 2.2. isn't even finalised, and the proposed new SCs may well change or
> even be dropped completely. And 2.2 builds on 2.1, so it's only really
> introducing additional SCs, but the rest is the same (with the
> exception of changes of levels for some old 2.1 SCs).
>
> Long story short: focus on 2.1. And when 2.2 is actually
> finalised/released, look at the new SCs that it introduces/subtle
> changes to any 2.1 SCs it brings.
>
> P