In March 2013, WebAIM conducted a survey of users with motor disabilities. We received 46 valid responses to this survey. This was the first survey WebAIM has conducted of this population, but we hope to conduct additional surveys of this nature again in the future. If you have recommendations or questions you would like us to ask, please contact us.
A few disclaimers and notices:
The sample size is very small. Because of this and because the responses came from a sample of convenience rather than one that was scientifically controlled, it is highly unlikely that the results represent the broader population of users with motor disabilities. Please do not attempt to generalize these data.
Totals may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Total responses (n) for each question may not equal 46 due to respondents not answering that particular question.
Demographics
Age
Select your age
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
0-20
2
2%
21-40
17
37%
41-60
23
50%
61+
5
11%
Internet Proficiency
Please rate your proficiency using the Internet
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Advanced
27
63%
Intermediate
14
33%
Beginner
2
5%
Respondents indicate a very high level of internet proficiency.
Disabilities Reported
Please identify your disability. (Select all that apply)
Disability
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Arthritis
11
23.9%
Cerebral palsy
9
19.6%
Spinal cord injury
7
15.2%
Loss or damage of limb(s)
4
8.7%
Muscular dystrophy
4
8.7%
Multiple sclerosis
4
8.7%
Essential tremor
2
4.3%
Spina bifida
0
0%
ALS (Lou Gehrig's Disease)
0
0%
Parkinson's disease
0
0%
Other
18
39.1%
Other disabilities reported include Repetitive Stress Injury (8.7%), Neuropathy (4.3%), etc. 22% of respondents report multiple disabilities.
Because of the limited sample size, these results should not be used as an indication of the prevalence of these disabilities generally or for users of the web.
Methods of Interaction with Web Pages
What is your primary means of interacting with a web page?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
With a mouse (including trackballs, eye tracking or other devices that behave like a mouse)
24
53.3%
With a keyboard (including adaptive keyboards, switches, and other devices that behave like a keyboard)
15
33.3%
Using speech recognition
6
13.3%
Operating System
Operating System
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Windows
36
78.3%
iOS
3
6.5%
Apple
5
10.9%
Android
2
4.3%
Linux
0
0%
Operating system data above was detected from the system used to complete the survey.
OS Settings
Which of the following settings do you enable in your operating system? (Check all that apply)
Setting
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Modifications to mouse behavior (e.g., mouse speed, click speed, hover to click, etc.)
28
60.9%
"Mouse keys" (numeric keypad to emulate mouse)
9
19.6%
"Sticky keys" or filtering repeated keystrokes
14
30.4%
Other
11
23.9%
Technologies Used
Which of the following technologies do you frequently use? (Check all that apply)
Technology
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Special keyboard
9
19.6%
Special mouse-like device (e.g., trackball, touchpad, joystick etc.) that you manipulate with arms/hands or legs/feet
15
32.6%
Mouth or head wand
3
6.5%
Switch device (e.g., puff-sip switch)
1
2.2%
Eye or head tracking
1
2.2%
Speech recognition
14
30.4%
Software to facilitate text entry (e.g., predictive keyboard)
8
17.4%
Virtual or on-screen keyboard
5
10.9%
Screen reader
6
13.0%
Other
10
21.7%
A wide variety of devices are used by respondents. 41% of respondents indicate using more than one type of device.
Enlarged Page Content
Do you enlarge a web page content or page text?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Yes, to make it easier to read
24
54.5%
Yes, to make it easier to interact with the content (e.g., click on a small button)
9
20.5%
No
11
25.0%
It is of interest that so many users enlarge web content, but primarily for readability when readability is not generally impacted by a motor disability.
Primary Browser
Which of the following is your primary web browser?
Browser
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Internet Explorer
13
32.6%
Firefox
12
26.1%
Chrome
10
21.7%
Safari
5
10.9%
Opera
3
6.5%
Others
1
2.2%
Internet Explorer was the most common browser for keyboard users, Firefox was most common for voice control users, and Chrome was most common for mouse users.
Influence of Browser Accessibility
Is your choice of primary browser influenced by its support for accessibility?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Yes
24
54.5%
No
20
45.5%
JavaScript Enabled
Respondents with JavaScript enabled
JavaScript Enabled
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Yes
46
100%
No
0
0%
JavaScript support was detected when the survey was submitted. These results clearly indicate that it is important that scripted interfaces be made accessible to users with motor disabilities.
Mobile Device Usage
Do you use a mobile device to access web content?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Yes
25
58.1%
No
18
41.9%
Mobile Platforms
Which of the following is your primary mobile platform?
Mobile Platform
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Apple iPad, iPhone, or iPod touch
16
34.8%
Android
11
23.9%
Blackberry
2
4.3%
Windows Phone
1
2.2%
Other
3
6.5%
None or No Response
13
28.3%
Mainstream or Disability-specific Mobile Device
Is your mobile device designed specifically for users with disabilities (i.e., not a mainstream phone or tablet)?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Yes, it is a device designed for users with disabilities
2
5.6%
No, it is a mainstream device
34
94.4%
Mobile Accessibility Settings
Do you use special accessibility settings or software on your mobile device?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Yes
12
36.4%
No
21
63.6%
Those who primarily use an iOS device are three times more likely than users of Android to use accessibility settings or software. Use of mobile accessibility settings is notably less than by those with visual disabilities (36% vs 63%).
Use of Mobile Versions
How often do you access the mobile version of a website because you find the interface more accessible?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Always
2
5.4%
Often
5
13.5%
Sometimes
9
24.3%
Seldom
11
29.7%
Never
10
27.0%
Skip Links
How useful are 'Skip to Main Content' or 'Skip Navigation' links to you?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Very useful
12
31.6%
Somewhat useful
11
28.9%
Not very useful
8
21.1%
Not at all useful
7
18.4%
Like users with low vision, respondents with motor disabilities generally find skip links to be useful. Keyboard users are much more likely to find skip links useful.
Hidden Skip Links
"Skip" links are sometimes presented in a way that makes them hidden visually until they receive keyboard focus. How useful are "hidden" skip links to you?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Very useful
2
5.7%
Somewhat useful
3
8.6%
Not very useful
12
34.3%
Not at all useful
18
51.4%
These data clearly show that hidden skip links are not useful to respondents.
Skip Link Position
Do you have a preference regarding the position of a skip link?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
I have no preference
28
60.9%
I prefer the top right
7
15.2%
I prefer the top left
11
23.9%
There is no clear preference for skip link position, though respondents with a preference favor the top left of a page slight more than the top right.
Form Labeling
If a form control (e.g., a checkbox) is correctly labeled, clicking on the text label (or saying the label when using speech recognition software) causes the form field to receive keyboard focus. Does the labeling of forms controls make it easier for you to interact with a form?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Yes
28
60.9%
No
4
8.7%
I was not aware of this functionality
14
30.4%
Interestingly, 41% of mouse users (for whom this functionality provides the primary benefit) are unaware of this functionality. In other words, those that use a mouse primarily were less likely to know about this mouse-specific functionality than those who primarily use a keyboard or voice control.
Accessibility Techniques
Which of the following accessibility techniques benefit you personally? (Check all that apply)
Technology
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Headings
22
47.8%
ARIA landmarks
3
6.5%
Descriptive link text
20
43.5%
Good contrast
19
41.3%
Captioned media
13
28.3%
Option to increase text size in the webpage
22
47.8%
Accesskeys
15
32.6%
Of note is a very low response to ARIA landmarks, something that would likely provide great benefit to this audience if navigation to them was supported in mainstream browsers.
Web Accessibility Progress
Which of the following best describes your feelings regarding the accessibility of web content over the previous year?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Web content has become more accessible
10
23.3%
Web content accessibility has not changed
30
69.7%
Web content has become less accessible
3
7.0%
Social Media Accessibility
In general, how accessible are social media web sites (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.) to you?
Response
# of Respondents
% of Respondents
Very Accessible
9
22.0%
Somewhat Accessible
11
26.8%
Somewhat Inaccessible
7
17.1%
Very Inaccessible
8
19.5%
I Don't Know
6
14.6%
Conclusion
Like all of our surveys, these results show a very diverse set of respondents, perhaps more so than with other disabilities due to the wider variety of types of disabilities (and thus technologies used) among those with motor disabilities. This highlights that there is not one universal solution to meeting the needs of such varied users. This is the first known survey of this audience focused primarily on web accessibility. While the response set was small, the information may be of interest to you and will be useful as future surveys are constructed.
Social Media Accessibility