E-mail List Archives
Re: <strong> vs <em>
From: Hunt, Jan
Date: Feb 12, 2007 9:30AM
- Next message: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program: "Re: vs "
- Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Annotated images"
- Next message in Thread: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program: "Re: vs "
- Previous message in Thread: Darian Glover: "Re: vs "
- View all messages in this Thread
Why is it that when I use JAWS or HomePage Reader, I detect no
difference in <em>, <i>, <b> or <strong>?
-----Original Message-----
From: Darian Glover [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 1:36 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] <strong> vs <em>
<em> renders as emphasized text. <strong> renders as strong emphasized
text.
Darian.
On 1/22/07, Gary Williamson < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Generator Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium) I' ve heard on the
grapevine that <strong> shouldn' t be used to emphasise text for screen
readers as it shouts a word rather than emphasises it! If this is the
case what can be used as an alternative? I' ve heard <em> can be used
instead, however, I' m not sure how?
>
> Regards
>
> Gary
>
- Next message: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program: "Re: vs "
- Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Annotated images"
- Next message in Thread: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program: "Re: vs "
- Previous message in Thread: Darian Glover: "Re: vs "
- View all messages in this Thread