E-mail List Archives
Re: development time and accessibility
From: Roberto Modica
Date: Mar 1, 2007 5:40AM
- Next message: Karl Groves: "Re: development time and accessibility"
- Previous message: Jennison Asuncion: "development time and accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Karl Groves: "Re: development time and accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Jennison Asuncion: "development time and accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread
It all depends on the company; to be honest I see it as part of the general
workflow of my designs so I don't really charge any extra unless it is a
larger scale project and some more prolonged tests are required, but you
could argue this is part of testing more then accessibility. The reason
being is a lot of accessible features can be accomplished just through
general good practice of web development. There are "grey" areas such as if
you have a form of media that cannot be made accessible, video or other such
technology, then transcripts would have to be produced, but again this may
not fall to your web developer that content may have to be produced by you
and given to your developer to implement.
I honestly feel that accessibility is a tool for web developers and is
something we should learn, like we learnt CSS and XHTML. It should be part
of the general workflow of your web design. If it is a retrofit project,
then costs should be associated as you are then providing a direct service,
but not a new design.
Regards,
Rob
Roberto Modica
Modika Limited
www.modika.co.uk
- Next message: Karl Groves: "Re: development time and accessibility"
- Previous message: Jennison Asuncion: "development time and accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Karl Groves: "Re: development time and accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Jennison Asuncion: "development time and accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread