E-mail List Archives
Re: Accessibility of redirects
From: Keith Parks
Date: Mar 6, 2007 11:20AM
- Next message: Al Sparber: "Re: Another failed redesign for accessibility"
- Previous message: Jared Smith: "Re: Accessibility of redirects"
- Next message in Thread: tedd: "Re: Accessibility of redirects"
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Accessibility of redirects"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Mar 6, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Jared Smith wrote:
> here's my opinion.
> The pages should redirect to the page that directly corresponds with
> the old destination. This should be done with a server-side redirect
> that sends a permanent redirect message to the web browser and search
> engines.
>
>> Should it be instant or delayed?
>
> Instant. Why bother the user with an error message when they've done
> nothing wrong? If you use the correct server redirects, it will be
> totally seamless to the user and search engines will be updated with
> the new location very quickly.
How does this method affect the browser's BACK button function?
My problem with client-side instant (zero delay) redirects is that it
can be nearly impossible for users to "back" past the redirect page
(unless they use the drop-down History list, which I find few people
seem to know about).
******************************
Keith Parks
Graphic Designer/Web Designer
Student Affairs Communications Services
San Diego State University
San Diego, CA 92182-7444
(619) 594-1046
mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED>
http://www.sdsu.edu
http://www.sa.sdsu.edu/communications
----------------------------------------------------------
World Peace through Cascading Style Sheets.
- Next message: Al Sparber: "Re: Another failed redesign for accessibility"
- Previous message: Jared Smith: "Re: Accessibility of redirects"
- Next message in Thread: tedd: "Re: Accessibility of redirects"
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Accessibility of redirects"
- View all messages in this Thread