E-mail List Archives
Re: Navigation lists and headers - best practise?
From: Karl Groves
Date: Aug 28, 2007 2:10PM
- Next message: Keith Parks: "Re: Legend wrap (or not)"
- Previous message: Stephanie Sullivan: "Re: Legend wrap (or not)"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Re: Navigation lists and headers - best practise?"
- View all messages in this Thread
> > To argue for the use of a "definition list" as being for anything
> > *other* than for a list of terms and definitions is without
> a doubt a
> > use of the definition list for a purpose it was not intended
> to
> > serve.
>
> There is no semantic tag for navigation labels. As such,
> whether one uses a header or a dl would be easily argued the
> same in terms of semantics or lack thereof.
>
> Given the rather rudimentary set of tags we have to work
> with, we make do.
You could always write your own DTD. Then you can have any element you want!
;-)
>
> I think I could argue either case in terms of which would be
> more semantic in this case. It's just that at the moment, I
> like the DL format.
Taking this discussion purely as one of "Navigation Lists", I find that
using a header which precedes a list (unordered, IMO, but ordered could be
argued) is the most appropriate. What is navigation, after all, but a list
of links?
Its sad, IMO, that the LH element never survived into a published
recommendation, dying on the vine of HTML 3.0, IIRC.
Karl
- Next message: Keith Parks: "Re: Legend wrap (or not)"
- Previous message: Stephanie Sullivan: "Re: Legend wrap (or not)"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Re: Navigation lists and headers - best practise?"
- View all messages in this Thread