E-mail List Archives
Re: strong vs. bold questions | Cite and Quotations also?
From: Nick Wilson
Date: Mar 11, 2002 12:28AM
- Next message: John Goldthwaite: "EZ-access"
- Previous message: Michael R. Burks: "Policy Information"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Holly Marie: "Re: strong vs. bold questions | Cite and Quotations also?"
- View all messages in this Thread
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
* and then marie Holly Marie declared....
> > On another list (webdesign-L <http://www.webdesign-l.com/>) the
> question > came up about using <strong> vs. <b> and why and when. I
> thought I'd ask > this here, too.
> This has always been a puzzle to me, because I felt both were very
> similar in meaning and also both were visually emphasized. I thought if
> one wants to emphasize the text in any format that bolding it either way
> would be acceptable.
Similar in appearance not meaning. em and strong are levels of emphasis
and b is bold text.
> When delivered in a lynx reader do both get bolded, equally? Print
> versions?
Yes.
> A case I have seen where one may bold inside a style on an element tag
> for presentation, and if styles are off this will not get displayed,
> might be missing that point that it will not be bolded in text only and
> or other media delivery?
I'm afraid I'm missing your point here....
> EM and Strong are considered Logical styles, where....
> B and I are considered Physical or presentational? styles...
Yep.
> At one time, I actually thought the W3C was contemplating the
> deprecation of both B and I, and having designer/developers switch over
> to using EM and Strong.
I think they are, although I'm not certain I think they may have
dropped it from the xhtml strict dtd.
> On most software- B seems to be the winner, maybe because it makes for
> smaller ICONs, and also I seems to be used for Itallics instead of EM
> for emphasis, which is opposite to that thought, in both Desktop
> Publishing Programs and many graphics and font generating software. So
> this is rather confusing and I always thought they were similar in
> nature.
What's confusing? /Software/ is the keyword here.
- --
- -----------------------------------------------------------
www.explodingnet.com | Projects, Forums and
+ Articles for website owners
- -- Nick Wilson -- | and designers.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE8jFypHpvrrTa6L5oRAmIwAJ452bK4B8ko14+BAFVkTJl3HfBR7wCeLTGZ
UWw1T6VQZkNy1Q2S5v8ypUk=RbPa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: John Goldthwaite: "EZ-access"
- Previous message: Michael R. Burks: "Policy Information"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Holly Marie: "Re: strong vs. bold questions | Cite and Quotations also?"
- View all messages in this Thread