E-mail List Archives
Re: Semantics for Indicating Accessible Version of Files
From: Chris Hoffman
Date: Jan 28, 2009 5:35PM
- Next message: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: Semantics for Indicating Accessible Version of Files"
- Previous message: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: Semantics for Indicating Accessible Version of Files"
- Next message in Thread: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: Semantics for Indicating Accessible Version of Files"
- Previous message in Thread: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: Semantics for Indicating Accessible Version of Files"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Randy Pearson < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> What we did not like was the table might already have 4 columns to
> include date, size, type, name. If you added the accessible version to the
> same row, then really you need 4 similar columns, as date, size, type apply
> separately to those files also. That approach felt both structurally and
> visually wrong.
How about a single additional column called, e.g., "Alternate
Version", that in an accessible row contains a link to the <tr> with
the original/submitted version, and in an original/submitted row
contains a link to the <tr> with the accessible version?
Chris
- Next message: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: Semantics for Indicating Accessible Version of Files"
- Previous message: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: Semantics for Indicating Accessible Version of Files"
- Next message in Thread: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: Semantics for Indicating Accessible Version of Files"
- Previous message in Thread: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: Semantics for Indicating Accessible Version of Files"
- View all messages in this Thread