WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: MSc Research - Does making a Website Accessible compromise Search Engine Optimisation?

for

From: Geof Collis
Date: Nov 17, 2009 5:50PM

I think Richard can ask his questions anyway he feels appropriate for
HIS dissertation. :O)

cheers

Geof

At 03:13 PM 11/17/2009, you wrote:
>I think the opinion poll is not intended to answer a question (i.e., whether
>accessibility compromises search engine ranking), but it is meant to provide
>insight into how different people approach this topic.
>
>If your opinion is that accessible web content increases search optimization
>then that's one of many possible responses to the poll. Others would
>probably argue from the opposite end and point out that paid SEO services
>often try to trick search engines by abusing the title attribute and hiding
>text on a page and so on. Taking these misleading elements out of a page
>or making them work as intended (e.g. title attributes that focus on true
>semantic value and not their techniqual potential to sneak in keywords)
>would certainly increase accessiblity, but potentially negatively affect SE
>ranking. The author of the opinion poll simply wants to get a feel for these
>different points of view, thus the name opinion poll.
>
>On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Hoffman, Allen < <EMAIL REMOVED> >wrote:
>
> > I'd like to know how an opinion poll for this topic would possibly be
> > useful as knowledge to answer this technical question. If you examine
> > how search optimization functions technically, then explore the usual
> > variations on correctly coded Web content for accessibility, you can
> > determine if the requirements have technical conflicts. Just going by
> > opinions and experiences is certainly not a real answer to this
> > provocative question. My opinion is that making Web content accessible
> > increases search optimization since text and semantic relationships are
> > programmatically determinable from accessible, structured content, and
> > may not be from unstructured, not intentionally coded content. In fact,
> > by intentionally encoding semantic meanings and text attributes in to
> > content, the overall information content generally rises, increasing
> > search systems ability to correctly find and classify content, exactly
> > the opposite to your question.
> >
> >
> > A more interesting question is if there are technical conflicts between
> > search optimization and accessibility requirements, what are they, and
> > how can they more effectively be reconciled, or how best can a Web
> > content producer encode for best results for both sets of requirements.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Evans [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 5:09 AM
> > To: Webaim
> > Subject: [WebAIM] MSc Research - Does making a Website Accessible
> > compromise Search Engine Optimisation?
> >
> >
> > Dear Webaim List Member,
> >
> > I am currently completing a Research Dissertation into Web Accessibility
> > and Search Engine Optimisation for an MSc Degree in E-commerce at
> > Swansea Metropolitan University - University of Wales.
> >
> >
> >
> > The basis of the research is that it is vital to make websites
> > accessible to as wide a range of users as possible, but do
> > "accessibility" design actions conflict with those actions taken to
> > optimise websites so that they reach the top of search engine ranking
> > pages (SERPS)?
> >
> > I have already written directly to a number of you and attached an MS
> > Word questionnaire - unfortunately, this presented some accessibility
> > issues.
> >
> > Therefore, I have now placed the questionnaire on SurveyMonkey and have
> > hopefully overcome these issues.
> >
> > I would be grateful if anyone who has not already received/ replied to
> > my survey could provide input to the project by completing the online
> > questionnaire which can be accessed at the following address:
> >
> > http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=S5SSS22U01WZbOj7Lm3mxw_3d_3d
> >
> > The questionnaire is designed specifically to allow me to reach
> > objective conclusions on the above question and I trust that you will
> > feel able to assist me with this important research.
> >
> >
> >
> > I would like to thank you in anticipation for your contribution and I
> > would be grateful to receive your completed questionnaire on
> > SurveyMonkey by Friday 20 November.
> >
> > With Best Regards,
> > Richard Evans
> >