E-mail List Archives
Re: accesskey
From: Bruna Poletto Salton
Date: Nov 9, 2010 5:51AM
- Next message: Michael.Moore@dars.state.tx.us: "Re: accesskey"
- Previous message: Patrick Burke: "Re: Accessibility testing program?"
- Next message in Thread: Michael.Moore@dars.state.tx.us: "Re: accesskey"
- Previous message in Thread: Birkir Rúnar Gunnarsson: "Re: accesskey"
- View all messages in this Thread
Thanks Denis.
This actually helped a lot. We believe that the shortcuts are a good thing.
All my blind co-workers really use them and expect that the website will
provide shortcuts.
But, there are some other people who think there's no need to offer
shortcuts. So, we're still discussing about this issue. I think it's gonna
take some time until we put a closure on this.
Thanks a lot.
Bruna Poletto Salton
Projeto Acessibilidade Virtual da RENAPI | Núcleo Bento Gonçalves
http://bento.ifrs.edu.br/acessibilidade
(55)(54) 3455 3219
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Denis Boudreau < <EMAIL REMOVED> >wrote:
> Hi Bruna,
>
> We've asked ourselves the same question as we were developing the
> accessibility standards up north in Quebec[1]. Accesskey have always been a
> matter of religion: people are usually either for or against them.
>
> Given the discoverability issues related to accesskeys and the fact that an
> organization just cannot expect its users to learn/remember the special keys
> reserved on every website they visit, we decided that accesskeys would not
> be allowed on public websites at all.
>
> However, on intranets or applications (where people were expected to use
> them on a regular, if not daily basis), then accesskeys can certainly prove
> useful because users might be tempted to learn and remember them in order to
> improve their efficiency.
>
> Same logic went for multimedia players, because we expect to offer a
> standardized player for every government agency or organization. Relying on
> the same player and making sure it uses control keys can and actually
> proves, to be useful.
>
> We recommended using the following, which have always been consensually
> approved:
>
> 1 = Homepage
> 3 = Site map
> 4 = Search
> 9 = Contact Us
> 0 = Accessibility
> s = Skip link
>
> No recommendations were provided as of yet regarding a multimedia player.
>
> Hoping this helps.
>
> [1] http://www.msg.gouv.qc.ca/normalisation/standards/accessibilite/
> --
> Denis Boudreau
> <EMAIL REMOVED>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2010-11-05, at 8:52 AM, Bruna Poletto Salton wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I always read all the messages from this list, but this is the first time
> > I'm actually asking something.
> >
> > I'm Brazilian and I'm working on the brazilian government accessibility
> > guidelines. We are not really sure if we should recommend the use of
> > accesskey in the brazilian government websites. Do people really use the
> > given shortcuts? Do they really work well?
> >
> > Thanks!!
> >
> > --
> > Bruna Poletto Salton
> > Projeto Acessibilidade Virtual da RENAPI | Núcleo Bento Gonçalves
> > (Virtual Accessibility Project)
> > www.bento.ifrs.edu.br/acessibilidade
> > (55) (54) 3455 3219
> >
- Next message: Michael.Moore@dars.state.tx.us: "Re: accesskey"
- Previous message: Patrick Burke: "Re: Accessibility testing program?"
- Next message in Thread: Michael.Moore@dars.state.tx.us: "Re: accesskey"
- Previous message in Thread: Birkir Rúnar Gunnarsson: "Re: accesskey"
- View all messages in this Thread