E-mail List Archives
Re: valid table?
From: Angela French
Date: Mar 25, 2011 9:15AM
- Next message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: valid table?"
- Previous message: Angela French: "Re: valid table?"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: valid table?"
- Previous message in Thread: Angela French: "Re: valid table?"
- View all messages in this Thread
While we are on the subject of PDF icons, I did this approach on the last site I built. I would be interested in your opinion about this method of presenting a document link and indicating it is a PDF.
<a href="pathtofile.pdf">Document Title <span class="filesize"> [<img style="border:none;" src="/graphics/ pdfLogo.gif"
alt="Portable Document Format" /> 100<abbr title="kilobytes">KB</abbr>]</span></a>
From: <EMAIL REMOVED> [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:41 AM
To: <EMAIL REMOVED>
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] valid table?
The problem with the page is not the use of the layout tables but the use of image links where the alt text is simply "PDF" the alt text should tell me what document I am downloading. In a links list I just see ...PDF PDF PDF PDF...
From: <EMAIL REMOVED> [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Angela French
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:27 AM
To: 'WebAim Forum ( <EMAIL REMOVED> )'
Subject: [WebAIM] valid table?
I have been asked to do an accessibility review of my agency's website. It was built by contractors a number of years ago, and we have many content contributors who create/maintain the page.
On many pages tables are used for layout to present/organize documents available for download. Here is an example:
While I personally would not use tables for presentations like this, I'm wondering if it really is inaccessible. While there is no <th> tag, they did use an <h> tags (not the semantically correct one though) and <p> tags in the <td>s . Given that this is not a complex table, it does linearize well.
I would be grateful for any opinions about this.
State Board for Community and Technical Colleges