WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: Screen readers usage and support

for

From: Elle
Date: Mar 6, 2012 3:33PM

Gary:

I just wanted to thank you for the thorough reply and excellent quote at
the end of your post.

Cheers,
Elle

*^* Sent with my cell. Please forgive typos.*^*
On Mar 6, 2012 3:24 PM, "Morin, Gary (NIH/OD) [E]" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
wrote:

> Keep in mind the following
> 1. EIT products conform to Section 508
> 2. Federal agencies comply (or not) with Section 508
> 3. JAWS or any screen reader-compatible software does not equal
> Section 508 conformant nor does it equal accessible to oh so many other
> people with other disabilities.
> 4. Accessible does not always equal Section 508-conformant
> 5. Section 508-conformant does not always equal accessible (except
> when the Functional Performance Criteria are taken seriously)
> 6. Accessible for a (fill in the blank) does not necessarily mean
> Accessible for any other (fill in the blank) - using either disabilities
> for each blank or assistive technologies for each blank.
> Is your Assistive Technology testing being done by real-life users of that
> AT or by non-disabled users who really aren't fluent in the AT?
> Is your Assistive Technology testing being done in addition to manual
> testing based on the formal Section 508 standards from the US Access Board?
> What company are you with?
> Gary M. Morin, Program Analyst
>
> WHAT IF THE FIRST QUESTION WE ASKED WAS, "WHAT IS SO UNIQUE ABOUT THIS
> SITUATION THAT IT JUSTIFIES EXCLUSION? INSTEAD OF, "HOW MUCH DOES IT COST
> TO MAKE IT ACCESSIBLE?"
>
>