WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: Links vs. Buttons

for

From: Hoger, Jodie
Date: Jun 4, 2012 11:13PM


Hi Heidi. I would prefer the first as my SR tells me it is a link that I can then click on to go to the graph. The latter tells me it is a button which is something I would select to perform a function like signing up to an email list or something. Does that make sense? I didn't actually consider the way it looks though. Are buttons easier to see than links?

Jodie Hoger
Teacher Consultant (vision), Equity Services TAFE NSW - Illawarra Institute, Building A, 60 Bienda St, Bomaderry, NSW, 2541
VOIP 54865| P 02 4421 9865| M 0437 035 042| F 02 4421 9804| E <EMAIL REMOVED> | www.illawarra.tafensw.edu.au




-----Original Message-----
From: <EMAIL REMOVED> [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Heidi Jungel
Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2012 7:11 AM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Links vs. Buttons

Thank you so much for your input. So, what you are saying is that if there
is a "close" option, you would prefer this be a link even though it goes
nowhere?

In other words, you would prefer this:
<a href="#"...>Close</a>
over this:
<button value="Close"©.>

Does anyone think that having the first would add to confusion? I am a low
vision developer who uses screen readers on occasion (when needed).
However, I have some vision, so perhaps my preference on a button is due
to the vision I have.

Thoughts?

Heidi Jungel, UI Developer
Apollo Group | Product Strategy & Development

Email: <EMAIL REMOVED> <mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> > |
Skype: hjungel

Please consider the environment before printing this email.





On 6/4/12 10:38 AM, "Jesse Hausler" < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:

>
>I would ask for buttons on form submissions, but beyond that I'll take a
>link over a clickable <div> any day of the week :)
>
>
>On 6/4/12 8:15 AM, "Heidi Jungel" < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
>Good Morning/Afternoon
>
>I could not find anything in our archives related to this. We have a
>discussion in my organization regarding links.
>I find that many sites abuse the use of links and use links for
>everything- even button type action. I have often used the following
>quote:
>
>"Links are for navigation (I.e. To another section of a page or another
>page). Buttons are for actions"
>
>However, I am a getting a bit of a push back on this. What are your
>thoughts on this? Are sites abusing links? Does using a button hinder
>the virtual cursor on screen readers (I have not seen this being a
>problem in JAWS 12)?
>
>We are just trying to get a guideline set for this for our developers.
>>Heidi Jungel, UI Developer
>Apollo Group | Product Strategy & Development
>Email: <EMAIL REMOVED> <mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> > |
>Skype: hjungel
>
>Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>>This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in
>error, please notify the sender and remove it from your system.
>
>>>>
>


This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and remove it from your system.


**********************************************************************
This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender.
**********************************************************************