E-mail List Archives

Re: NAD v. Netflix: "This is a bad ruling. Reallyterrible."

for

From: John E Brandt
Date: Jun 29, 2012 9:33AM


Great job, Andrew (as usual)!

~j

John E. Brandt
www.jebswebs.com
<EMAIL REMOVED>
207-622-7937
Augusta, Maine, USA

-----Original Message-----
From: <EMAIL REMOVED>
[mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Andrew
Kirkpatrick
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 10:09 AM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] NAD v. Netflix: "This is a bad ruling.
Reallyterrible."

As a counterbalance to the ARSTechnica post and others like it:
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility/2012/06/ruling-on-accessibility-and-the
-ada.html

In short, I think it can be said that we disagree...

AWK

-----Original Message-----
From: <EMAIL REMOVED>
[mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Kroon, Kurtis@FTB
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:07 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] NAD v. Netflix: "This is a bad ruling.
Reallyterrible."

-----Original Message-----
From: John E Brandt [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 14:06
To: 'WebAIM Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] NAD v. Netflix: "This is a bad ruling.
Reallyterrible."

<snip>

"Update: Although I believe the statute and case law make it clear that ADA
does not apply to websites, I also believe that responsible websites should
voluntarily undertake extra efforts to accommodate users with disabilities.
In many cases, doing so will actually increase profits by expanding the
userbase; and even where it isn't, it's a good business decision both as a
matter of corporate ethics and for providing extra utility to all users."

Not exactly sure what that means...


[KK] Here's how I would paraphrase it:

*I* don't think the ADA applies to websites, but that doesn't matter.
We should make our websites accessible because:

* Customers with disabilities do have money. If our site is more accessible
than our competitors', they are more likely to spend their money *with us*.
* It even helps customers who don't have disabilities.
* It's the right thing to do.

<end paraphrase>

Regards,

Kurtis
California Franchise Tax Board

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email from the State of California is for the
sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review or use, including disclosure
or distribution, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this email.
messages to <EMAIL REMOVED>
messages to <EMAIL REMOVED>