WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

RE: Testing for compliance

for

From: He, Jenny
Date: Sep 6, 2002 5:42AM


I was in the conference yesterday. We are using InFocus and has some problem
with it. Thank for your paper. It is very helpful.

Jenny He
Aspen Systems Corp
2277 Research Blvd
MS 8I
Rockville, MD 20850
(301) 519-5807

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Thatcher [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:28 AM
To: <EMAIL REMOVED>
Subject: RE: Testing for compliance


I definitely planned on a section on both A-Prompt and Wave but have not
gotten to it. Sorry about that.

Jim Thatcher
Accessibility Consulting
http://jimthatcher.com
512-306-0931

-----Original Message-----
From: Jukka Korpela [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:54 AM
To: ' <EMAIL REMOVED> '
Subject: RE: Testing for compliance


Jim Thatcher wrote:

> You might find my evaluation of testing tools helpful,
> http://jimthatcher.com/erx.htm

An impressive collection of reviews! Have you planned doing some review of
A-Prompt, too? In my (much more limited) tests I have come to the conclusion
that among the tools, A-Prompt is currently the most promising. Too bad
there seems to be little sign of continuous development of A-Prompt, and
A-Prompt is not really something I would like to run for my documents
routinely, after each change. The reasons are explained in my short review
of Bobby and A-Prompt, prefaced with some general notes on the
(im)possibility of automated checks on accessibility:
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/www/acctools.html

--
Jukka Korpela, senior adviser
TIEKE Finnish Information Society Development Centre
http://www.tieke.fi/ My phone +358 9 4763 0397


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/