E-mail List Archives
Re: <title> content order?
From: Paul J. Adam
Date: Jan 28, 2013 4:17PM
- Next message: Monique Brunel: "Re: A short video showing users with different disabilities using a computer or mobile device to browse"
- Previous message: Jared Smith: "Re:
content order?" - Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re:
content order?" - View all messages in this Thread
The user can name their bookmarks however they'd like but they cannot control the author's page title. I'd leave bookmarks out of the equation.
I'm not sure that I know of any logical reasons for putting the site name first when it comes to accessibility.
Paul J. Adam
Accessibility Evangelist
Deque Systems
<EMAIL REMOVED>
www.PaulJAdam.com
@pauljadam on Twitter
On Jan 28, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Jared Smith < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Keith Parks wrote:
>
>> So you'll have to think how much this might affect your users if the bookmark gives page specifics first, and site ID last. It seems to me that would make a bookmark list harder to scan, whether visually or aurally.
>
> And I could argue that having site ID first would make differentiating
> multiple bookmarks from the same site more difficult.
>
> In the end, I think this is generally a matter of personal preference.
> There are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches. Neither is
> wrong or 'inaccessible'.
>
> Jared
> > >
- Next message: Monique Brunel: "Re: A short video showing users with different disabilities using a computer or mobile device to browse"
- Previous message: Jared Smith: "Re:
content order?" - Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re:
content order?" - View all messages in this Thread