E-mail List Archives
Re: Wired News Redesigned for Accessibility
From: Tom Gilder
Date: Oct 11, 2002 4:29PM
- Next message: Timothy J. Luoma: "Re: Wired News Redesigned for Accessibility"
- Previous message: Joe Clark: "Re: Wired News Redesigned for Accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Timothy J. Luoma: "Re: Wired News Redesigned for Accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Holly Marie: "Re: Wired News Redesigned for Accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Friday, October 11, 2002, 9:27:30 PM, Jared Smith wrote:
> They don't yet meet WCAG priority 1 http://bobby.watchfire.com/...
Please don't use Bobby to ascertain if any site meats a WCAG level.
It'll give you it's best guess if they have or not, but it is by no
means always correct. Bobby can point out suspected errors, but only a
human can decide if a site meats the guidelines.
Personally after a quick look, I think that Wired does pretty much
come up to WCAG level A. It certainly is a hell of a lot more
accessible than it used to be. Bobby flagging alt="" on an invisible
spacer gif as an error is idiotic.
--
Tom Gilder
http://tom.me.uk/
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: Timothy J. Luoma: "Re: Wired News Redesigned for Accessibility"
- Previous message: Joe Clark: "Re: Wired News Redesigned for Accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Timothy J. Luoma: "Re: Wired News Redesigned for Accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Holly Marie: "Re: Wired News Redesigned for Accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread