E-mail List Archives
Re: summary or caption
From: Greg Gamble
Date: Jun 10, 2013 3:30PM
- Next message: Gunderson, Jon R: "Re: A better PDF editor for accessibility?"
- Previous message: Tony Olivero: "Re: Label for a set of radio buttons"
- Next message in Thread: Alan M. Dalton: "Re: summary or caption"
- Previous message in Thread: ron@ahead.org: "Re: summary or caption"
- View all messages in this Thread
Maybe I'm naive, but can't you fudge the truth on what you say a working site is? Just tell a customer that the site is incomplete until accessible, so new sites will take longer and use more resources then ones that were created ten years ago. Most are clueless on what it takes to create a good site ... so don't say why ... blame the new browsers coming out or something similar.
To me it used to be anything that passed a validator was a finished site ... black and white, pass or fail. It's now become much more than that. There's a lot of gray around the edges nowadays, so it's not just about validating code, but validating the accessibility of the site too. So wouldn’t a completed site be an accessible one too?
- Next message: Gunderson, Jon R: "Re: A better PDF editor for accessibility?"
- Previous message: Tony Olivero: "Re: Label for a set of radio buttons"
- Next message in Thread: Alan M. Dalton: "Re: summary or caption"
- Previous message in Thread: ron@ahead.org: "Re: summary or caption"
- View all messages in this Thread