E-mail List Archives
Re: A better PDF editor for accessibility?
From: Jonathan Metz
Date: Jun 11, 2013 4:57PM
- Next message: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: Proposed: a TN tag to join TH and TD?"
- Previous message: Keith Parks: "Re: Proposed: a TN tag to join TH and TD?"
- Next message in Thread: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: A better PDF editor for accessibility?"
- Previous message in Thread: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: A better PDF editor for accessibility?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Olaf Drümmer wrote:
>- NVDA: free of charge
Only works on PC (for now?)
>- Adobe Reader: free of charge
Doesn¹t come installed on a Mac, considered by some to be the cats pajamas
of accessibility.
>- callas pdfGoHTML: free of charge (admittedly, and for the time being
>while it's not yet Reader enabled, you also have to own Acrobat Pro)
Totally awesome software making Acrobat Pro better than it is.
>- accessible PDF so far has not been a success story
Isn¹t it premature to make this statement? Isn¹t it less than a year old?
>- it has the potential to become a first class citizen in the world of
>accessible content BUT ONLY if it is not too difficult to make them
It¹s only difficult to make it if the software lacks in some fashion.
>- people who wear the black belt of PDF remediation are not in the best
>position to shape the way forward...
There is very little one ever has to worry about that. People who excel at
remediation have little to no ability to shape the way forward. We are at
the mercy of the governments and corporations that dictate which
provisions we must follow.
>...they are potentially biased because they make a living off of bad PDF
>under artificially difficult conditions)
Not sure I understand this statement?
>- instead creation of accessible PDF must be democratized (it must become
>easy for every document creator to produce an accessible PDF,
To assume that software will ever be able to 100% create accessible
content some how according to the various specs is not practical. Software
currently cannot handle all the various manual things that a user must do
to ensure accessibility.
>insisting on TUROT order will substantially slow that down)
100% agree. Unfortunately, people who create accessible content are at the
mercy of the laws and provisions of the land. It¹s easy for you to say to
ignore it, but for those of us with Federal contracts, it isn¹t so easy...
Jonathan
- Next message: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: Proposed: a TN tag to join TH and TD?"
- Previous message: Keith Parks: "Re: Proposed: a TN tag to join TH and TD?"
- Next message in Thread: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: A better PDF editor for accessibility?"
- Previous message in Thread: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: A better PDF editor for accessibility?"
- View all messages in this Thread