E-mail List Archives
Re: Sec. 508 Refresh (U.S.)
From: John E Brandt
Date: Mar 11, 2014 2:04PM
- Next message: John E Brandt: "DOJ Enters Into Landmark Web and Mobile App Consent Decree"
- Previous message: Gaddam, Puneet (MU-Student): "Re: Do transcripts have to be time-stamped?"
- Next message in Thread: Angela French: "Re: Sec. 508 Refresh (U.S.)"
- Previous message in Thread: Bourne, Sarah (ITD): "Re: Sec. 508 Refresh (U.S.)"
- View all messages in this Thread
Yes, this is just one more step along a very long process that began in 2006 when the Access Board created the Telecommunications and Electronic and Information Technology Advisory Committee and gave them the unenviable task of coming up with a new set of standards that everyone could agree upon. It took two years for the Advisory Committee to issue a report and another two years before the first draft of the "refresh" were published.
But unlike many regulation revision activities in the federal government, this one is actually moving, albeit slowly.
~j
John E. Brandt
jebswebs: accessible and universal web design,
development and consultation
<EMAIL REMOVED>
207-622-7937
Augusta, Maine, USA
@jebswebs
- Next message: John E Brandt: "DOJ Enters Into Landmark Web and Mobile App Consent Decree"
- Previous message: Gaddam, Puneet (MU-Student): "Re: Do transcripts have to be time-stamped?"
- Next message in Thread: Angela French: "Re: Sec. 508 Refresh (U.S.)"
- Previous message in Thread: Bourne, Sarah (ITD): "Re: Sec. 508 Refresh (U.S.)"
- View all messages in this Thread