E-mail List Archives
Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?
From: Jonathan Avila
Date: Jan 5, 2015 8:25AM
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- Previous message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- View all messages in this Thread
> Is using a PLACEHOLDER attribute instead of a <label> tag enough to satisfy WCAG2? I know that using a TITLE attribute is a sufficient technique, but not
I would have concerns on relying on this attribute to provide a programmatic label because I consider it to be fallback content rather than a labeling attribute, however, the HTML to Platform Accessibility APIs Implementation Guide<http://www.w3.org/TR/html-aapi/> indicates it is used in the accessible name calculation. It is likely not fully supported by assistive technology. Specifically to my knowledge it is not supported by speech recognition software.
In addition, I have concerns that SC 3.3.2 may not be met when the field contains data since the placeholder would not be shown.
Best Regards,
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
SSB BART Group
<EMAIL REMOVED>
Phone 703.637.8957
Follow us: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Blog | Newsletter
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- Previous message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- View all messages in this Thread