WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: How is PDF accessibility evaluated?

for

From: Susan Grossman
Date: Feb 6, 2015 3:19PM

So I shouldn't be using the WCAG guidelines (and I thought the W3 was a
standards board) at all?

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Chagnon | PubCom < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:

> Duff is correct; WCAG has only techniques & methods for making accessible
> PDFs. They are not standards nor guidelines. Far from it!
>
> Because they are not standards, they cannot be used, for example, to
> assess whether a PDF is in fact accessible. Governments can't formally
> adopt them into law as they have WCAG itself. You can't file a complaint
> using techniques to back up your claim because techniques can't hold up in
> court. So think of what WCAG has published as only suggestions on how to
> make an accessible PDF.
>
> For better guidance on standards for PDFs, see the PDF/UA Competence
> Center's website at
> http://www.pdfa.org/competence-centers/pdfua-competence-center/ You'll
> learn about the ISO 14289 standard for Universally Accessible PDFs ... a
> real standard.
>
> And you'll also Duff's smiling mug gracing the website's banner <grin>
>
> --Bevi Chagnon
>
> — — —
> Bevi Chagnon | www.PubCom.com
> Consultants, Trainers, Designers, and Developers
> For publishing technologies
> | Acrobat PDF | Digital Media | XML and Automated Workflows
> | GPO | Print | Desktop Publishing | Sec. 508 Accessibility | EPUBs
> — — —
>
> -----Original Message-----
> > WCAG 2.0 has standards for PDF's located here:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/pdf.html
>
> From: <EMAIL REMOVED> [mailto:
> <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Duff Johnson
> Clarification: these are Techniques, not Standards… a non-trivial
> distinction.
>
> > > >



--
*Susan R. Grossman*
<EMAIL REMOVED>