E-mail List Archives
Re: How is PDF accessibility evaluated?
From: Olaf Drümmer
Date: Feb 9, 2015 3:34PM
- Next message: Jim Allan: "accessible ecommerce cart"
- Previous message: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: How is PDF accessibility evaluated?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: How is PDF accessibility evaluated?"
- View all messages in this Thread
The idea in PDF is that anything that is presentational only or goes back to a mechanical process (like pagination or even hyphenation), and is not inherently semantic (i.e. carrying some meaning as intended by the content's author), is an artifact. Besides referring to the process of pagination, PDF 1.7 also speaks of " Purely cosmetic typographical or design elements" - which are also artifacts.
Olaf
On 9 Feb 2015, at 22:42, Jonathan Avila < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>> The real content of a document comprises objects representing material originally introduced by the documents author.
>
> So would that make it inappropriate to artifact purely decorative document content supplied by the author?
>
> Jonathan
>
>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 1:07 PM, Olaf Drümmer < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>>
>> The real content of a document comprises objects representing material originally introduced by the documents author.
> > >
- Next message: Jim Allan: "accessible ecommerce cart"
- Previous message: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: How is PDF accessibility evaluated?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: How is PDF accessibility evaluated?"
- View all messages in this Thread