E-mail List Archives
Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conformingPDFdocument?
From: Jonathan Avila
Date: Apr 15, 2015 7:48AM
- Next message: Wloch, Rob: "Re: Previous and Next buttons on HTML forms"
- Previous message: Duff Johnson: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conforming PDFdocument?"
- Next message in Thread: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conformingPDFdocument?"
- Previous message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conforming PDFdocument?"
- View all messages in this Thread
> The lack of embedded fonts can cause a range of issues varying from (merely) an unintended ugly appearance to total illegibility.
Regarding WCAG -- how is the experience specifically for people with disabilities impacted over the experience of people without disabilities. It seems that this is an overall usability issue for all people -- but WCAG is focused on situations where comparable or equivalent access is not provided to people with disabilities.
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
SSB BART Group
<EMAIL REMOVED>
703-637-8957 (o)
Follow us: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Blog | Newsletter
- Next message: Wloch, Rob: "Re: Previous and Next buttons on HTML forms"
- Previous message: Duff Johnson: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conforming PDFdocument?"
- Next message in Thread: Chagnon | PubCom: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conformingPDFdocument?"
- Previous message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conforming PDFdocument?"
- View all messages in this Thread