E-mail List Archives
Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?
From: Lynn Holdsworth
Date: Jul 20, 2015 10:28AM
- Next message: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Next message in Thread: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message in Thread: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Michael,
Thanks for those useful suggestions.
I can't really fail it on contrast, because it's been resized to 1px
to make it invisible so there's no contrast to test.
But yes, I should be able to fail it under keyboard operable.
Cheers, Lynn
On 20/07/2015, Moore,Michael (HHSC) < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> I would mark the following as failures for a AA audit. 1.4.3 Contrast
> minimum. The invisible text obviously does not have sufficient contrast to
> be read by anyone. Also, 2.1.1 Keyboard. You cannot operate something via
> the keyboard if you do not know what it does.
>
> Mike Moore
> Accessibility Coordinator
> Texas Health and Human Services Commission
> Civil Rights Office
> (512) 438-3431 (Office)
> (512) 574-0091 (Cell)
>
>
- Next message: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: Tiny clickable element: does this fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Next message in Thread: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- Previous message in Thread: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Where does invisible link text fail WCAG2?"
- View all messages in this Thread