WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: Accessible CMS for writer AND reader? Contao? Wordpress? Ghost? Other? And opinions of Markdown for authoring?

for

From: Jonathan H
Date: Oct 13, 2015 6:56AM

Thanks for all the feedback; I was particularly interested in the
reply about the "Recommended FOSS CMS for accessability?" thread (see
below).

However, can someone please confirm something:

When I click Jennifer's archive link, there are only two subjects:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2015OctDec/
When I search, I get 5 results, all very recent:
https://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=w3c-wai-ig&index-type=t&keywords=Recommended+FOSS+CMS+for+accessability%3F&search=Search

When I click any of those results, I get "not found"
https://www.w3.org/mid/ <EMAIL REMOVED> %3blist=w3c-wai-ig

Before I send a bug report, can someone please confirm the same
results? It's a shame, as this sounds like a thread I should really be
reading!

But thanks also to others for the suggestions, too.

On 12 October 2015 at 18:31, Jennifer Sutton < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Greetings, WebAIM:
>
> As some may have noticed, there's a similar discussion about CMSs going on
> on the WAI-IG email list, starting here:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2015OctDec/
>
> Although I'm not seeing the most recent messages in the archive, yet, I'm
> sure they'll show up shortly.
> The thread is called:
> Recommended FOSS CMS for accessability?
>
> I've sent a link to this WebAIM thread to WAI-IG, too.
>
> Finally, for those who may not be aware, it may be helpful to consider ATAG
> 2.0. Start here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/
>
> But please also consider supporting documents, beyond the recommendation
> itself.
>
> Best,
> Jennifer
>
> > > >