E-mail List Archives
Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?
From: Kelly Lupo
Date: Mar 28, 2016 3:02PM
- Next message: Druckman,Geri: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- Previous message: Druckman,Geri: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- Next message in Thread: Druckman,Geri: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- Previous message in Thread: Druckman,Geri: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- View all messages in this Thread
The actual standards can be found on access-board.gov
<https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communications-and-it/about-the-section-508-standards/section-508-standards>,
and WebAIM.org has a breakdown of the regulations
<http://webaim.org/standards/508/checklist> that is absolutely wonderful in
terms of translating them from legalese into English. (WebAIM also has a
PDF version of the checklist, if you want to print it
<http://webaim.org/standards/508/508checklist.pdf>.)
Additionally, WebAIM also has a Chrome plug-in for checking compliance
<http://wave.webaim.org/extension/>, as well as a web-based compliance
checker <http://wave.webaim.org/> if you can't install things.
Both sites have tons of resources that I've found helpful in my starting to
learn about Section 508. (WebAIM also has WCAG 2.0 guidelines, as well.)
Kelly
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Druckman,Geri < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> This is an excellent point. At the moment I will assume this is not for
> our employees, but by the nature of the institution I work for, any
> employee may become a client at any given timeÅ
>
> We do receive federal funding to an extent, and from a conversation I had
> with HR, we de need to comply with sections 508, 504, and 503.
> I guess I need to dive head first into Section 504 and catch up on my
> reading. If you have some guidance that can get me to the right places in
> section 504, I¹ll greatly thankful.
>
> Geri Druckman
> Web Development Specialist
> Accessibility|Usability|QA
> MD Anderson Cancer Center
>
>
>
> On 3/28/16, 3:31 PM, "WebAIM-Forum on behalf of Moore,Michael
> (Accessibility) (HHSC)" < <EMAIL REMOVED> on behalf of
> <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> >Hi Geri,
> >
> >I can see a few potential points of pain for your organization.
> >
> >Does this application provide access to information or services for which
> >your organization receives federal funding? If so you may potentially be
> >risking a compliant under section 504.
> >
> >You may be risking a complaint under the ADA in the following two
> >situations.
> >
> >Does this application provide access to information or services to
> >members of the public and is there an accessible alternative to using
> >this application available from the same place where you link to the
> >external application?
> >
> >Does this application provide access to information or services to
> >employees and/or potential employees and is there an accessible
> >alternative to using this application that is available from the same
> >places where you link to the external application?
> >
> >Mike Moore
> >Accessibility Coordinator
> >Texas Health and Human Services Commission
> >Civil Rights Office
> >(512) 438-3431 (Office)
> >
> >
- Next message: Druckman,Geri: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- Previous message: Druckman,Geri: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- Next message in Thread: Druckman,Geri: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- Previous message in Thread: Druckman,Geri: "Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern?"
- View all messages in this Thread