E-mail List Archives
Re: which guideline to empty headers go against?
From: Bim Egan
Date: Nov 22, 2016 1:40AM
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: which guideline to empty headers go against?"
- Previous message: Jonathan Cohn: "Re: which guideline to empty headers go against?"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: which guideline to empty headers go against?"
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Cohn: "Re: which guideline to empty headers go against?"
- View all messages in this Thread
I'd say this is a definite fail of SC 2.4.6: Headings and labels describe
topic or purpose, [1]. No text content means no description.
Empty headings probably also fail SC1.3.1 Info and Relationships [2] check
out Failure Technique F43: Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.1 due to using
structural markup in a way that does not represent relationships in the
content [3]
HTH,
Bim
[1] - SC2.4.6 (Level AA)
http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-descriptive.
html
[2] - SC1.3.1 (Level A)
http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/content-structure-separation-progr
ammatic.html
[3] - Technique F43
http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20161007/F43
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: which guideline to empty headers go against?"
- Previous message: Jonathan Cohn: "Re: which guideline to empty headers go against?"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: which guideline to empty headers go against?"
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Cohn: "Re: which guideline to empty headers go against?"
- View all messages in this Thread