E-mail List Archives
Re: Scope attributes vs ID and Headers attributes
From: Chagnon | PubCom
Date: Jun 1, 2017 9:13AM
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Scope attributes vs ID and Headers attributes"
- Previous message: Dona Patrick: "Scope attributes vs ID and Headers attributes"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Scope attributes vs ID and Headers attributes"
- Previous message in Thread: Dona Patrick: "Scope attributes vs ID and Headers attributes"
- View all messages in this Thread
Donna wrote:
"This is for HHS if that matters."
I was just about to write that the tables with the more complex column headers, such as <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bx8AFXyl5hgRZjE4Y2dKeGpSSzg/view>, might be able to be broken into 2 separate tables, which reduces the tedium of multi-level headers.
But if you do check with the HHS 508 office, they'll probably require that you do just that. Break bigger tables into 2 or more tables and reduce many of the column header levels. Sure makes it easier to deal with the IDs and scope, as well as providing a better experience for those who use AT.
--Bevi Chagnon
- - -
Bevi Chagnon | www.PubCom.com
Technologists, Consultants, Trainers, Designers, and Developers
for publishing & communication
| Acrobat PDF | Print | EPUBS | Sec. 508 Accessibility |
- - -
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Scope attributes vs ID and Headers attributes"
- Previous message: Dona Patrick: "Scope attributes vs ID and Headers attributes"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Scope attributes vs ID and Headers attributes"
- Previous message in Thread: Dona Patrick: "Scope attributes vs ID and Headers attributes"
- View all messages in this Thread