E-mail List Archives
Re: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts
From: Joel Ward
Date: Sep 4, 2003 4:16PM
- Next message: Jim Thatcher: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- Previous message: Jon Gunderson: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- Next message in Thread: Jim Thatcher: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- Previous message in Thread: Karl Groves: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- View all messages in this Thread
> Forgive me if I am off base. I am coming into this conversation late.
> IMO, a site is a complete accessibility failure if the content is not
usable for persons with JavaScript off/ with browsers that do not recognize
JavaScript.
I agree.
But some accessibility is better than no accessibility.
And keep in mind there are often "baseline" requirements for web sites that
include a certain browser version and/or browser functionality (e.g.
scripting enabled). Whether these sorts of requirements are valid for
public web sites is up to debate, but the fact is that this happens all of
the time.
While Section 508 is not nearly close to fulfilling Universal Access, it has
at least brough the most basic accessibility standards to the forefront. If
a user with a Javascript-enabled browser can use their assistive technology
to access a site, then at least a portion of the "spirit of the law" is
alive.
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, suspend, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: Jim Thatcher: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- Previous message: Jon Gunderson: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- Next message in Thread: Jim Thatcher: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- Previous message in Thread: Karl Groves: "RE: Section 508 Standards Compliance and Scripts"
- View all messages in this Thread