E-mail List Archives
RE: <em> v. <i> and <strong> v. <b>
From: Karl Groves
Date: Sep 5, 2003 9:53AM
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "RE: v. and v. "
- Previous message: Ben Morrison: "Re: v. and v. "
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
> Although this kind of pragmatism isn't typical of standards
> people, the
> reason those two tags haven't been formally deprecated might
> just be the
> practical fact that such deprecation would instantly render
> millions of
> otherwise largely inoffensive web pages invalid.
I'd venture to guess that these same sites have scores of other reasons they'd be invalid.
;-)
Karl L. Groves, Certified Master CIW Designer
E-Commerce Manager
NASA Federal Credit Union
500 Prince Georges Blvd.
Upper Marlboro, MD 20774
301-249-1800 ext.497
Fax: 301-390-4531
Opinions expressed in this e-mail represent only myself and are not in any way to be taken as the words or opinions of my employer.
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, suspend, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "RE: v. and v. "
- Previous message: Ben Morrison: "Re: v. and v. "
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread