E-mail List Archives
Re: fontsize vs. window width and line length
From: Jonathan Avila
Date: Sep 24, 2017 6:19PM
- Next message: mhysnm1964@gmail.com: "Internal tool accessibility justifications"
- Previous message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Navigating listbox with NVDA"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: fontsize vs. window width and line length"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: fontsize vs. window width and line length"
- View all messages in this Thread
> . Are any numbers recommended?
This was discussed in the low vision task force at the W3c. Some people had suggested 25 characters per line for people with low vision. In the end the proposed success criteria in the current working draft calls for support of 400% zoom at 1280 which comes down to support zoom without loss of content or functionality at 320 CSS pixels (with exceptions). This is of course still a proposed working draft and changes can occur.
https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
Jonathan
Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
Level Access, inc. (formerly SSB BART Group, inc.)
(703) 637-8957
<EMAIL REMOVED>
Visit us online: Website | Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn | Blog
Looking to boost your accessibility knowledge? Check out our free webinars!
The information contained in this transmission may be attorney privileged and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
- Next message: mhysnm1964@gmail.com: "Internal tool accessibility justifications"
- Previous message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Navigating listbox with NVDA"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: fontsize vs. window width and line length"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: fontsize vs. window width and line length"
- View all messages in this Thread