E-mail List Archives
Heading Structure - Must vs. Nice to habe
From: Wolfgang Berndorfer
Date: Jan 22, 2018 3:57PM
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Heading Structure - Must vs. Nice to habe"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Fourth rule of aria > aria-hidden"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Heading Structure - Must vs. Nice to habe"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Tinkerers,
Am I right with my impression that SC 1.3.1 describes the *necessity* of
adequate semantic markup and hierarchy for headings, while SC 2.4.10 advises
that it's *fine* to have heading information for sections e.g. via
aria-label additionally or principally to optimize navigation to navs,
articles, etc?
Thanks for clarifications!
Wolfgang Berndorfer
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Heading Structure - Must vs. Nice to habe"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Fourth rule of aria > aria-hidden"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Heading Structure - Must vs. Nice to habe"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread