WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: Query on heading hierarchy

for

From: KP
Date: Mar 22, 2018 3:58PM

True Bevi, I would assume 1.3.1 requires the visual formatting to be logical too. It should probably refer to logical rather than visual

Sent from my iPhone

> On 23/03/2018, at 10:07, < <EMAIL REMOVED> > < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> Kevin wrote: That doc in your shop needs an editor and a mandatory style guide :)
>
> You're absolutely right! However, we're stuck with hundreds of pages of pure crap that we can't edit.
>
> But getting back to SC 1.3.1.
> Speaking as an editor, it really isn't correct to have structure follow visual formatting. That's what causes the problems throughout the entire workflow for everyone, regardless of the technology used to publish and access the content.
>
> Like the structure of a house, it has to be done correctly or there will be problems in using the house. Doesn't really matter how you decorate the house, that's your choice. But a door must be a door and must function as a door. Otherwise it's not really a door.
>
> So in the plans, you architect the building for a 36-inch wide door and the owners buy any door they want to fit in the opening, be it glass, wood, red, green, Colonial, modern, whatever.
>
> It's still a 36-inch door that everyone understands how to use and can use, regardless of its appearance.
>
> Form follows function. That means we must create items that must perform their intended function...and make them look good.
>
> It also means the SC 1.3.1 has it backwards.
>
> —Bevi
> — — —
> Bevi Chagnon, founder/CEO | <EMAIL REMOVED>
> — — —
> PubCom: Technologists for Accessible Design + Publishing
> consulting ' training ' development ' design ' sec. 508 services
> Upcoming classes at www.PubCom.com/classes
> — — —
>
> > > >