WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: Confirmation of actions - violation or feature?

for

From: Ajay Sharma
Date: Jul 18, 2018 11:49PM

Thanks Jonathan and Rakesh, that pretty much helped us in right
direction, further I'll take the point that it is more useful if sr
would say the count of filtered items rather than just announcing
filter applied.


Cheers,
Ajay

On 7/18/18, Jonathan Cohn < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> I would also suggest that just "filter applied" is minimally useful as a
> status. I would prefer if an approximation of the size of the filtered
> results can be quite helpful.
>
> On 18 July 2018 at 10:41, Maxability A11Y < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ajay,
>>
>> In many cases the content that is modified because of filters is after
>> the
>> filter components and the user will navigate forward to read the filtered
>> content. The announcement of the alert that says filters applied is a
>> best
>> practice as far as my knowledge is concerned. Anything that gets updated
>> before the initiating element in the content sequence can be considered
>> violation. Since this is a content change for the sequence I hope it is a
>> 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence success criteria.
>>
>> As you said that the page is refreshed, consider checking the focus of
>> the
>> screen reader after hitting the filter button. Chances that the screen
>> reader focus may jump to an arbitrary region on the page which may cause
>> in
>> 2.4.3 Focus order failure.
>>
>> Hope this helps.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Mohith BP < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Is there any clue for the non-screen reader users such as any change
>> > of color, shape such as arrow up / down etc.?
>> > then 1.1.1, 1.3.3 and / or 1.4.1.
>> >
>> > Are there other mechanisms such as remove filter which indirectly
>> > notifies the users that the filter has been applied?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks & Regards,
>> > Mohith B. P.
>> >
>> > On 7/18/18, Ajay Sharma < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>> > > Hey All,
>> > >
>> > > Need your thoughts on this situation, would you consider it as
>> > > accessibility violation or a usability feature?
>> > >
>> > > Expected - Screen reader should confirm"Filters Applied" after user
>> > > hits "Apply" button after selecting the filters from the filters
>> > > dropdown.
>> > > Actual - Page refreshes when "Apply" button is clicked and screen
>> > > reader doesn't say anything.
>> > >
>> > > Although there is SC 4.1.3 Status Messages in WCAG 2.1 for it but we
>> > > do not follow it till now, the closest SC seems to be 1.23.1 Info and
>> > > Relationship.
>> > >
>> > > Thoughts?
>> > >
>> > > Best Regards,
>> > > Ajay
>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > >> > >> > >> >
>> >> >> >> >>
> > > > >