E-mail List Archives
Re: [External Sender] WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?
From: Lovely, Brian
Date: Jul 25, 2018 6:10AM
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- Previous message: pratik roy: "WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- Previous message in Thread: pratik roy: "WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- View all messages in this Thread
-- From: PRATIK ROY: " Example: In a form, suppose we have two password fields one for current and other one for new password. Purposeful label is provided for both but no -- auto-fill="{current-password | new-password}". Now the question is, can we capture a violation here?"
This would have to be manually tested. Since there is no universal label for these fields, a machine couldn't tell what they were for and therefor wouldn't know what the correct values of the autofill field would be.
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- Previous message: pratik roy: "WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- Previous message in Thread: pratik roy: "WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- View all messages in this Thread