E-mail List Archives
Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?
From: Philip Kiff
Date: Jul 31, 2018 7:10AM
- Next message: Karlen Communications: "Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?"
- Previous message: Philip Kiff: "Re: Accessible CMS"
- Next message in Thread: Karlen Communications: "Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?"
- Previous message in Thread: Alan Zaitchik: "Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Alan, I've seen folks mention the CommonLook Validator, but their
website doesn't make it clear that it is intended for free use, they
tell you to contact them for a "free trial" version:
https://commonlook.com/accessibility-software/commonlook-pdf-validator/
Does their license allow ongoing use without purchasing the product?
Phil.
On 2018-07-31 8:51 AM, Alan Zaitchik wrote:
> Bevi,
> I have found that the free CommonLook Validator plugin finds a lot more issues that Acrobat's Accessibility Checker. (And you can select the standards you're checking against.)
> Even allowing for fact that some reported failures may be false positives, is there a reason not to start with Validator?
> (I have no experience with PAC 3.0.)
> A
>
>> On Jul 30, 2018, at 6:59 PM, < <EMAIL REMOVED> > < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>>
>> We find that no one tool finds everything.
>> We recommend that our clients run the Acrobat checker first, correct the
>> errors it finds, and then run PAC3.
>> Acrobat does not find all errors...not even close!
>> Wish it did a better job, though.
>>
>> --Bevi Chagnon
>>
>> - - -
>> Bevi Chagnon, founder/CEO | <EMAIL REMOVED>
>> - - -
>> PubCom: Technologists for Accessible Design + Publishing
>> consulting . training . development . design . sec. 508 services
>> Upcoming classes at www.PubCom.com/classes
>> - - -
>> Latest blog-newsletter - Accessibility Tips
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of
>> Tomlins Diane
>> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 3:40 PM
>> To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
>> Subject: [WebAIM] Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Looking for some feedback on these 2 tools. We have a vendor that is telling
>> us NOT to use Acrobat's A11y check tool, and to instead use PAC 3.0. In
>> house, we've been using Acrobat since we don't yet have an Enterprise
>> solution for PDFs.
>>
>> The vendor states that PAC is the industry standard and "Acrobat should not
>> be used for a checker - That is the reason they were getting so many errors
>> when in fact it was passing when run through the PAC site."
>>
>> So, what might be the reason for what they think are marked differences
>> between what PAC reports as pass/fail/errors vs. Acrobat ? Is it better to
>> use them in tandem? I'm not crazy about a vendor admonishing us to only use
>> the tool THEY use. I have reviewed PDF's they send back to us as 'passed'
>> and the document will have failures in Acrobat.
>>
>> The other wrinkle with PAC is it only works on Windows, and we a growing
>> contingent of folks on Macs.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Diane R Tomlins
>> HCA IT&S | Digital Media
>> Accessibility SME
>>
>>
>> >> >> >> >>
>>
> > > >
- Next message: Karlen Communications: "Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?"
- Previous message: Philip Kiff: "Re: Accessible CMS"
- Next message in Thread: Karlen Communications: "Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?"
- Previous message in Thread: Alan Zaitchik: "Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?"
- View all messages in this Thread