E-mail List Archives
Re: Sliders and MouseDown
From: Isabel Holdsworth
Date: Feb 28, 2019 3:17AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- Previous message: Steve Green: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- View all messages in this Thread
Pressing ESC may not be an option for some pointer users, and I don't
think would be accepted as a sufficient technique for 2.5.2, which
seems to stipulate that it must be possible to cancel a DOWN event
using only the pointer.
I wish I knew whether or not this behaviour applies to sliders.
On 27/02/2019, Steve Green < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> That's a really good point. My (possibly incorrect) understanding is that
> your analysis is correct, and that there should be a way to cancel and
> return to the original slider position. However, I have not been able to
> find any example of a slider that has such a behaviour.
> I would not have thought that it would be too difficult to use the Escape
> key to do this, but I am not a developer so nothing looks difficult from my
> Steve Green
> Managing Director
> Test Partners Ltd
> -----Original Message-----
> From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of
> Isabel Holdsworth
> Sent: 27 February 2019 15:15
> To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> Subject: [WebAIM] Sliders and MouseDown
> Hi all,
> Any thoughts on whether WCAG 2.1 guideline 2.5.2 might apply to sliders?
> For normal drag-and-drop components, if a user starts dragging an element
> then changes their mind, dragging it somewhere outside the permitted drop
> zones causes the element to be plonked back where it started.
> Should the same behaviour apply when a user begins dragging a slider thumb,
> say, on the volume control or play-head of a media player? If they begin
> dragging the play-head then have a change of heart and move the pointer
> outside the slider, should the play-head jump back to where it started? And
> if it doesn't, would this fail 2.5.2?
> Lots of stuff to grapple with in my first 2.1 audit :-)
> Thanks as always for your thoughts.
> Cheers, Isabel
> > > http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> > > > > >